October 26th, 2009
Posted in 
“Which version will be the King of the Iron Fist in this Head2Head?”
 |
 |
|
 |
|||||||||
| Namco |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Namco | |||
| Namco |
1 | 1 |
Namco |
|||||||||
| Fighting |
4.6 GB | 6.7 GB |
Fighting |
|||||||||
| Release: 10/27/09 | 18 sec | 10 sec | Release: 10/27/09 | |||||||||
| ESRB: Teen |
0.0% | 0.0% | ESRB: Teen |
|||||||||
 |
 |
|||||||||||
 |
||||
 |
 |
|
Head2Head -Tekken 6 Length: 00:05:49 We go Head2Head with Tekken 6 on the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360.Which version will be the King of this Iron Fist in this Head2Head? Watch the video to find out. |
|
 |
 |
|||
 |
||||
Thanks to the fine folks at Play N Trade (Lake Mary), the Lens of Truth was able to get our fists on the new Tekken 6 for the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360. As many of you know, the renowned Tekken series has always been a PlayStation exclusive, so it has never been brought home on any other gaming console. Stick around because there can only be one Iron Fist champion in this arena!
Graphics: Graphically, the Tekken series has usually been a cutting edge franchise, raising the bar with every iteration. We still remember playing Tekken on the PS1 and thinking how awesome Namco did with the port from the arcade. Here at the Lens of Truth, we have always been big fans of the Tekken series and our anticipation to play this game was quiet high. Visually, both games look nearly identical. We really strained our eyes looking for differences, but we couldn’t see anything major. We even tinkered around with the motion blur feature in the game’s options to see if one looked better, but once again, nothing to write home about. With that said, Namco did a superb job keeping both games balanced in the graphics department. Even though they look nearly identical, it really is nothing to brag about. You’ll understand why later.
Performance: Not much to report here. Both games run at a solid 60 fps with absolutely no screen tearing; the truth of the matter is that this was expected. However, this is the first game we’ve run through our analysis which scored near perfect so it earns a little reward on our site for that.
PlayStation 3 Avg. FPS: 59.98 / Xbox 360 Avg. FPS: 60.0
PlayStation 3 Avg. Frame Tear: 0.0% / Xbox 360 Avg. Frame Tear: 0.0%
Loading: Here’s where things get interesting and where a winner was decided. Surprisingly, the Xbox 360 demolished the Playstation 3 in loading times. Even when we installed Tekken 6 on the Playstation 3 it still loaded slightly more slowly than the Xbox 360 running off the disc. Since the install was not mandatory, we felt that an install for the PlayStation 3 would also require an install on the Xbox 360 (we like to keep the playing field as even as possible). The install for the Xbox 360 did absolutely nothing for loading times matching as if it was running from the disc. However, the install on the Playstation 3 did help load times and it would be beneficial to install this game on the PlayStation 3, but for Head2Head’s sake, the install still couldn’t compete with the Xbox 360’s disc speed. Why Namco didn’t just require a mandatory install is beyond us. Listed below are the load times for both systems, with and without installs.
PlayStation 3 Load Times (Not installed):
Time #1 (loading trophies, saved data etc…) 18 – 18.4 seconds
Time #2 (loading characters and preparing to fight) 16 – 18.8 seconds
Xbox 360 Load Times (Not installed):
Time #1 (loading saved data etc…) 0 – 0.3 seconds
Time #2 (loading characters and preparing to fight) 10 – 10.5 seconds
PlayStation 3 Load Times (Installed 4.6 gb):
Time #1 (loading trophies, saved data etc…) 1 – 2 seconds
Time #2 (loading characters and preparing to fight) 11 – 12.2 seconds
Xbox 360 Load TImes (Installed 6.7 gb):
Time #1 (loading saved data etc…) 0 – 0.3 seconds
Time #2 (loading characters and preparing to fight) 10 – 10.5 seconds
Roll over to see the differences. Here we compare the different HDMI settings between the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3.
Roll over to see the differences.
Roll over to see the differences.
Roll over to see the differences.
Roll over to see the differences.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the deciding factor was the load times so the win goes to the Xbox 360. Although performing the optional installation on the PlayStation 3 helped level the playing field, we here at the Lens of Truth stick with our “out-of-the-box” policy. Namco really shouldn’t have given PlayStation 3 owners the option to install; it should be mandatory. What concerned us the most about the PlayStation 3 load times was the online play. There will be a lot of waiting for challengers if you are paired with someone that hasn’t installed. In every other area ,both games played and looked identical and if it weren’t for the load times this would have been a tie. Unfortunately, this time around we were a little disappointed with the quality of this game, especially the graphics, and we expected a little more from Namco on this one.
 |
|||
| G R A P H I C S | |||
 |
Tie. The graphics on both versions look almost identical to one another resulting in a deadlock. Texture quality, lighting, motion blur and particles were ported over between consoles flawlessly. |  |
|
| P E R F O R M A N C E | |||
|
Tie. Again both versions performed identically maintaining a constant frame rate and absolutely no screen tearing to report, also the PlayStation 3 upscales to 1080i/p resolution. | |
|
| L O A D I N G | |||
 |
Xbox 360 won this category by sporting drastically faster load times than the PlayStation 3 version. This time around the PlayStation 3 version didn’t require a mandatory install, but Namco should have made it that way. Only after installing on the PlayStation 3 did the load times match the Xbox 360 version. |
|
|
| O U T C O M E | |||
|
Out-of-the-box, the Xbox 360 version is our flavor of choice. If you do decide to install it on the Playstation 3, the load times will be decreased but be warned the online matches may take a hit depending on who you are paired with. | |
|
 |
|||
| C O M M E N T S | C H O I C E | ||
 |
I am not sure what happened to Tekken 6. I am really disappointed on how the visuals look in this game. Some assets feel like they could have been ripped directly from the PSN’s Tekken 5. The ground textures are blurry, everything is highly aliased and really the only thing it has going for it visually is the motion blur. But, I am a Tekken fan for the roster and play mechanics. Just next time Namco, polish the game a bit more before shipping. |
|
|
| Corey | “…assets feel like the could have been ripped from Tekken 5…” | ||
 |
The Tekken series has always been one of my favorite fighting franchises, due to their outdoing themselves with each new addition. Unfortunately, Tekken 6 falls a little short, especially in the graphics department. I wish Namco focused on just one platform and delivered something a little more visually appeasing, but all in all, Tekken 6 is still a rock solid fighter. The Xbox 360 version is the choice for me, having half the loading time.
|
|
|
| Shawn | “…Namco what happened?…” | ||
 |
I’m not into fighting games like this. I thought I was looking at DOA or Soul Calibur at first. The panda is weird though, but we all know how panda’s like to fight! So when everyone was unimpressed with this game, I went home. The load times is what really lets the Xbox 360 win, just like it did for Street Fighter IV. |
|
|
| John | “… I went home…” | ||
Loading ...
Tags: *To ensure color accuracy from the PlayStation 3, Xbox 360 and Wii U output, the PlayStation 3 has RGB Full Range set to "Full" and Super White "On", and the Xbox 360 has Reference Level set to "Expanded" and HDMI Color Space set to "RGB". Our capture card we have captured segments from the AVS HD 709 . Blu-ray, HD DVD, & MP4 Calibration suite.
As you will see, each system matches each other at the SOURCE LEVEL. No contrast or gamma settings are manipulated before or after capturing our images/videos. We strongly believe that these types of corrections are done on a individuals preference and should not be adjusted by us. Finally, washed out looking images that are due to contrast or gamma differences will not have any influence on our final verdicts. Please Read through our F.A.Q page if you have any questions or concerns.*
NO this is a joke
The Ps3 version looks much sharper than the 360 version.
Tekken 6 on ps3 has 2xMSAA the 360 has no AA
This should have been a Ps3 win.
Well… its not that clear. depends on if you have motion blur on or off.
If blur is ON both have no AA
If blur is OFF the PS3 version has 2xMSAA but runs at 1024×576 while the 360 is rendered at 1365×768
I think the blur effect adds alot to the games visuals so I think most people will play with it on meaning, the msaa is actually irrelevant.
“If blur is OFF the PS3 version has 2xMSAA but runs at 1024×576 while the 360 is rendered at 1365×768″
And the game was MADE on PS3 – ARCADE machine is “PS3 in the cab” so this time there will be no moaning that leading platform was X360 so thats why PS3 version is inferior….
The ps3 version has better colours
The Ps3 has better graphics
First 3 comments look like mild samefagging.
What does fagging mean ?
It means GAY…
I have to agree with them. The colors are more natural in the PS3 version and the shadows are more defined.
I have to disagree. Remember this dynamic lighting and what you see could actually be due to that. Also the colors are so subjective and mean absolutely nothing. Think about it for a minute you can adjust that with you T.V or monitor so having slightly diff rent colors means nothing. Thank god LOT doesn’t consider color into their decisions.
Wow many ps3 fanboys all over the interwebs. How can yo say they look at all different? Xbox 360 wins, get it into your thick skulls.
Duh this article is connected to N4G.
Sony fanboys happen to be the majority on that site (after the great war of N4G where the Droids defeated the Bots who were once the majority) so any article about gaming if it hits N4G and becomes popular/interesting then nasim(the worst of the Sony fanboys, even the sane Sony fanboys dislike him) and his crew will spam you.
An example of nasim’s work, remember the EA Forums SPAM attack after the whole X-game chat debacle it was attributed to the one and only nasim.
Oh shut the fuck up. Really. So someone says the PS3 version looks better and that automatically makes them a PS3 fanboy?
Grow the hell up.
Someone says the xbox one looks better he gets a kick in the nuts a bunch of insults…
Someone says the Ps3 version looks better he gets 2345 thumbs up and it’s followed by more comments like here <3 till now right ?
You can't say something bad about Sony or Ps3 GOD forbid or the Ps3 version without being burn on the stake.
Thus because the Sony fanboys and girls are so much more agresive than the rest when you see a comment your bound to say Ps3 fanboy!!!
Do you follow me ?!
pretty much… ever since the price drop there has been a massive surge of retard fanboys, pretty much ever site from joystiq to eurogamer all litered with sony propaganda :/
Funny how you (tried) to make this comparison appear legit by comparing all kinds of things like graphics and loading times. But failed to include where the game really differs:
CONTROLS and sound.
PS3 controls CRUSHES and DEMOLISHES that crap 360 controller anytime of the day, week and month.
And sound is true Dolby surround sound on PS3.
In other words, PS3 version absolutely dominates the 360 version. Nice try but fail article.
when article said ‘demolishes ps3′, one can clearly read b/w lines, like something is coming from inside of author as he tries hard to point some flaw out.
Are you kidding. Sound and controls is your argument. Controllers vs Arcade stick is a personal opinion and should not be weighed in the Head2Head. Now, you also probably mean the PS3 is using uncompressed Dolby 7.1 sound right? Well infact the original Xbox could do true Dolby surround sound so whats you point. Any who if you had a $3,00 receiver to decode the uncompressed 7.1 audio then yea the sound would be better on the PS3, but do you know anyone with a receiver like that? NO!!!
Ya I have to agree. Both games support very good digital audio and unless you got an expensive home theater setup you’ll never take advantage of it. I have the game for both systems and it looks identical and unless you guys start doing some major scrutinizing its not gonna make a difference. The controls however do favor the Ps3 for some moves but overall very good on both.
BOTTOM LINE: its an amazing game no matter which system you play it on.
Whats equally disgusting is how all a majority of American blogs are claiming that the 360 version wins when the REST OF THE WORLD, including the fking developers at Namco, are saying that the PS3 version is better.
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2009/10/06/tekken-6-ps3-vs-xbox-360-ps3-victorious/
PS3 versions IS superior. Its a lie to say that the 360 version comes anywhere close.
A dirty game is being played behind the scene and Microsoft is handing out checks all over the place.
Not necessarily paycheck , form day 1 there have been proamerican bias, because 360 is american baby and sony is not, maybe thats why japanese torture 360/M$ with poor poor sales in japan.
I am glad that UC2 blows 360 out of competition, now its more of debate ‘how developers can or cannot handle ps3′ rather than ps3 sucks.
Whats disgusting is that you are implying that because some Blogs are American they will automatically support Xbox 360. As if there werent fans of ps3 in America.
Actually the PS3 does have the slight edge in graphics, with better AA. Quite a few sites have already confirmed this.
You/ the article also fails to mention how the graphics comparison was with MOTION BLUR ON. But at the same time, loading time comparison was with MOTION BLURR OFF.
As Sankaku and even IGN have already elaborated, Tekken 360 looks worst than PS3 with MOTION BLURR OFF. But with MOTION BLURR TURNED ON, the graphics look the same as PS3 version. But the downer is that MOTION BLURR INCREASES 360 loading time by 10-15 seconds.
So this entire “comparison” is a lie. Talk about failure. Do you think we are idiots or something?
Wow, at the rate you are replying I would say they touched a nerve.
First, if you read and watch the video they only turned motion blur off for one clip. Other than that everything is default.
As for the PS3 version having 2xAA, good for it. It doesn’t show in ANY of the pictures or roll overs.
Face it, visually it is a tie. And if you are zooming in 500% to see a difference that is not impacting the overall quality then you have issues.
And since all of the times were done default, with the so called “MOTION BLURR INCREASES” (spell much?)Xbox 360 loading times…the Xbox 360 still beat the PS3 in terms of loading. Install or not.
Something else I find funny is the fact that you believe this: “including the fking developers at Namco, are saying that the PS3 version is better.” and this, “A dirty game is being played behind the scene and Microsoft is handing out checks all over the place.” Proves to me that I am having a conversation with a middle school student.
Never trust a site that has truth or honest in its tittle. This site being no exception.
lol , very true but these sites normally do this sort of stuff to generate buzz/controversy heated debates , flame wars in order to increase traffic and money.
well, I have swap my ps3 HDD with a 7200 rpm HDD. And my SF4 load 3 seconds faster than on my old HDD after install. So are many other game. Basically the best option to play Tekken 6 is still PS3 if you are going to swap with a faster HDD.
Although I find “JokeComparison”‘s responses ridiculous and immature he does make a valid point.
“The PS3 version is locked to 1024×576 in both major display modes, but the omission of motion blur allows Namco to add in a 2xMSAA filter. Xbox 360′s answer to AA is to supersample 1365×768 down to 720p and lower texture filtering.”
I don’t blame Lens of Truth though, i’m sure most people would realize this unless they fumbled around through the options. So good work team nonetheless.
And Joke, the team here isn’t biased. I barely know the group in person but I try to defend them as much as possible because of the time and effort they put in helping people. They are not endorsed by any company to falsify their statements.
And we’re all human arn’t we? We can make minor errors or overlook something. There’s no point in accusing them as liars.
LOL @ the sony fanboys.
Jokercomparison, that article is weak. who plays their games zoomed in?
im staying loyal tekken to sony on this one. its not that big of a difference. installed has a 1 second delay. big deal. playing the arcade, it had loading too so i wasnt surprised.
still, the loading shouldn’t be enough to award a definite winner since the install on ps3 makes it not an issue anymore. if that option was not there, different story.
the turning off motion blur is weird.. but did anyone else notice on ps3 if you change the language to japanese on BlazBlue the loading is faster?
wow i just realized i only have doa4 and vf5 online for 360. i guess i went opposite the winner on more than this..
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-tekken6-resolution-game-blog-post
Eurogamer also says the ps3 version looks better.
but i agree with the guy above me, with fighting games it really comes down to controls.
its not ALSO, everyone is quoting the DF article instead of doing their own analysis.
Wow, and everyone knows they are 360 Biased too. Interesting
Graphically, the PS3 is mildly, if even that, better. To bad the WHOLE slow BluRay thing hurts your butts way too much!
How were the loading times measured? Was it just for the stock characters or were they measured using custom outfits? I only ask since custom outfits will require random reads on the disc and should increase load times. Random outfits are also more likely to be seen when fighting online. Could you please state how you measured the loading times.
Lol @ 360 faggots.
Someone is butthurt.
Site should be renamed to “Lens of Fail”. Every other comparison they nit pick the hell out of PS3 graphics down to the damned pixels. Now the PS3 version of a multi-plat has 2x MSAA, True Dolby Digital Surround, more natural and better color saturation, can be upscaled to 1080 and arguably the better controller for a fighter. Yet the 360 version wins based on LOAD TIMES? Get over yourselves. Yes Mr. Ballmer, your check definitely cleared this week.
“Now the PS3 version of a multi-plat has 2x MSAA”
Hmm…funny how the 2x MSAA only gets enabled when you DISABLE the much toted motion blur that was “only possible on the PS3″.
So if I have to turn off a feature, that is on by default, to get slightly better antialiasing that’s a fail in my book.
Namco should have delayed this game til 2010 spent more time on the graphics.
When’s the last time you played Tekken and the game took more than 5 seconds to load. I remember every Tekken I’ve played usually loaded pretty quick. Also True Dolby Digital has been done on the original Xbox and I’m sure the Xbox 360 could handle it. Also the Xbox 360 version runs at a higher resolution.
“If blur is OFF the PS3 version has 2xMSAA but runs at 1024×576 while the 360 is rendered at 1365×768″
I just wanna say
PAWNED !!!
I see you have come from the 90′s to say that.
No I think he meant
PAWND !!!
Looking forth to Digital Foundry in giving THE SAME VERDICT !!!
Tehehehe
Ps3 always gets the bad version
Wow. So even though the PS3 version looks better and if you install, loads just as fast, you still give the upper hand to the 360?
They made it mandatory so people COULD CHOOSE.
“They made it mandatory so people COULD CHOOSE.”
Eh? You mean, “optional” so people could choose, surely? This discussion has happened before though. You can optionally install ANY Xbox 360 game in full, but they always use the loading times from the game running from disc for their conclusion. I notice you weren’t here shouting “Sony bias!” then though were you?
Ok so if the people making Tekken 6 made it mandatory, the PS3 version would’ve tied? But because its optional, its ..not?
Makes no sense
exactly.
they measured trophy loading? any ps3 owner knows trophy loading is broken. you dont even need a game in the system to see that’s loading calamity.
They are comparing “out of the box” performance with no optional installs, which is what they’ve always done. You’re complaining about this, yet you don’t seem to mind that they have never once used the 360′s optional installs to compare loading times, because if they did, the PS3 would never win that category. If the PS3 install was mandatory, they’d have no choice but to install it to do the comparison, lol.
“no” is moaning about them measuring the time it takes to load trophy info and the game save, but you have no option but to do that, so it adds to the loading times.
The 360 is faster at loading the game when both are playing from disc, and it’s faster when both are installed (although not by as much), so I don’t see why you’re moaning. At least you can know that you won’t be playing an inferior looking version of this game on your PS3 for a change, but you seem more concerned that the PS3 didn’t achieve a tie in some online comparison. lol.
@no
If you actually watched the video you would see the load time differences in action.
@Microshock
They are damned if the do, damned if they don’t. If they made a special case and tied the PS3 by going against their out of box policy then it would negate previous head2heads. And by sticking with it, people still bitch and moan.
It is tough because only an out of box scoring system will work. Otherwise on every game that has a mandatory install on the PS3 to play, they would have to install it on the Xbox 360 as well. The problem is that the PS3 does the mandatory installs to match the speed (or come close) of the Xbox 360′s DVD format.
Guess they can’t please everyone.
controls go to ps3 hands down though.
Good game and I recommend it for both console users. You won’t regret it:)
Thanks for the comparison
You should stop eating so much sweets Bart…
Many thanks for including the extra data about 360 installs!
I see that the Sony fanboys are out in force. lol. I guess after all the defeats the PS3 has suffered, they had this ex-Playstation exclusive down as a win for them. What a shame! Haha.
These are so stupid and only fuel stupid fanboy wars about inanimate game systems.
Buy it on whatever system where you like the controller.
i like how people say the ps3 controller is better than 360 for fighting games, when these arguments were the same years ago against saturn and playstation, where they said the saturn controller beats psx..
psx controller sucked then, but ps3 controller is cool now? same d-pad!!
hehe.. i actually have a saturn controller for ps3. best controller out there.. (for fighters)
http://cgi.ebay.com/Genuine-Original-SEGA-Saturn-SS-USB-Control-PS3-Black_W0QQitemZ260496164403QQcmdZViewItemQQptZVideo_Games_Accessories?hash=item3ca6c80633
These comparisons makes no sense because this is another watered down game to fit both systems. If this was a PS3 exclusive, Uncharted 2 cough cough the graphics would have probably looked even better.
yes and the only reason namco made it multi-platform is to sell more copies.
being ps3 exclusive would hurt their profit.
remember when tekken was better than the arcade versions because they CARED about the home ports?
sad.
ugh… you guys sure are ignorant, tekken 6 was made for arcades using System 357 board which is a PS3 equivalent arcade board.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_357
so no it’s not watered down, the game was developed with the intent of being a ps3 game.
Oh look, Paul just took 89% of my life with one cheap combo! Tekken is a crap game anyway. I’m surprised they’ve made this many! Not to mention the animations are always wonky.
I wouldn’t play this on any console even if I was paid to!
Wow, I am just suprised and annoyed how many posters all of a sudden felt the need to be so defensive of PS3, even though Lens of Truth says graphics are the same. Seems fair.
What got to me the most is how someone suggested American bloggers are necessarily xbox supporters. What prejudiced crap. Its like saying all Japanese will like ps3 just because its made in Japan, not because it has better games.
I don’t care shit about the graphics and slightly longer load times.
I have to pick up the PS3 version simply because this is a fighter. And if you actually play a ton of fighters (like me) you know the 360 d-pad is complete shit.
Usually I buy multi plat games on the 360 for gamerscore…but never for fighters.
if you really played alot of fighters you’d have an arcade stick or at the minimum a fightpad…
i usually agree with your verdicts but i find myself scrastching my head on this one. graphics wise, id say ps3 is better. and as for the loading, i think it should be tied if the ps3 has an optional install which fixes the loading issue. i often see your writers complaining about long installs on the ps3 version, but when they make them optional, you still complain cause now you actually want to install them. make up your mind!
anyways, im voting for ps3 version. with equal loading after an install, and in my opinion better graphics. plus, ps3′s d-pad is instant win over xbox 360′s.
Heck, they’ve been wrong before with Batman:AA being better on PS3, so they could be wrong on this one.
Anyway, it’s a good game, & I think that both 360 & PS3 owners should pick it up & enjoy it.
xbots are retarded, if you want to talk about the graphics. Other ps3tards have shown links that confirms that PS3 version is better, so no argument in that!
In the end, PS3 version is better, because this is a fighter game, and fighter controls are better on PS3!
Or will you be playing fighting games for loading times?
That’s one of the dumbest comments so far.
The links prove nothing. They still look the same. So one is brighter then the other..big f’ing deal.
As far as controls, I agree that for 2D games, PS3 controls are better. But for 3D it doesn’t matter. The game plays the same.
This should have not gone to the 360 just because the load times were faster. All that really matters is if it performs withought hitches and looks good.
Are people Fucking Blind! It looks 99% the same! Colors looking better? What?!? If anything look at the fire in the background on the second to last image! It’s the only subtle difference I can find and it looks just slightly better on 360. An I shouldn’t really count that anyway! Load times WAY better on 360, only difference, 360 wins. Is it that hard to find a winner? Get a fightstick if you don’t like the 360 controller, I use my DOA4 fighstick and love it! Quit being dumbass fanboys you fucktards!
Whoa, calm down there buddy. Fanboys arent gonna ruin your life, or mabye they will idk.
Good lord. I have never seen so many fanboys…. The game looks the SAME. The 360 wins with me as the loading times are way better even w/o a install vs the PS3 LOL.
I think it’s quite funny, how the PS3 fanboys are more present on about any game-related website.. It’s not much different here, the poll is totally useless since all it equals is a fanboywar
Is it maybe because the PS3 doesn’t have so much cool games to play.. unlike Xbox 360.. Or is it maybe they are so frustrated about their console and Sony they need to vent this on Internet..
The PS3 does seem to have somewhat better lightning to my likings. but graphically seems thesame.. I’d consider this a TIE, yet all sonyboys press the PS3 button to hope to have their console get a win
That’s because most of the PS3 fanboys are the ones that forked out $500-$600 on the console.
They want to justify there purchase.
They can’t believe that a cheaper,”lesser”, older console can hold it’s own against the mighty PS3.
LOL at all the PS3 apologisers.
Many ps3 owners are disappointed. Why don’t you just accept the fact that it loads faster on the xbox 360? Besides, this game is a bit of a letdown anyway.
MY name is Ps3fanboy and my butt hurts so much!!!
PS3 fanboys are absolutely the worst there has ever been. When the 360 wins it’s because of “pro-American bias” or “the site is paid by Microsoft!”, lol. Stretch those tin foil hats on to your heads a bit tighter fantards! Starting a thread on some PS3 fantard site and getting a bunch of other simple-minded fantards to come here and vote en masse for the PS3 version won’t change the fact that once again, the 360 wins. You bought the wrong console. Get over it. Or, I know, why not reply to my post and say “Heavy Rain! Gran Turismo 5! God of War!”, i.e. roll out the same list of overrated games you’ve been using as weak ammunition for the last 3 years, as they get delayed time and time again.
i m not a ps3 fanboy
but i really do think PS3 version is better.
I couldnt care less, because i m not going to play this game anyways, but on the pictures above, look at the picture with the PANDA
When you roll over for XBOX 360 picture, you cant see the PANDA’s eyes,
from what I understand, not being able to see the eyes clearly does not mean it hgas better graphics, its actually the other way around
Maybe the Panda’s blinking???
Lawwwls Rudesole you’re the man.
Can’t wait for Final Fantasy XIII
I vote PS3, because Xbox controler is hard to use. PS3 controler is better than xbox
Wow all this
“Fanboy this, Fanboy that.”
STFU really.
It is the same game! Yeah ok the 360 loads better, yeah ok the ps3 looks better. Missing a couple seconds won’t kill you for not playing the other ver, missing x2 AA wont kill you playing the other ver. It is still the same damn game available to both systems so STFU!
I have both systems, I have to say I thought this was a comparison between a PS2 and Xbox game. Really, this game looks horrible. Both systems can certainly do much better than this.
It kills me that a game that traditionally has state of the art graphics has been compromised to this degree so it can be equal for both systems.
I will buy this game when it is in the 20 dollar bargain bin for the Ps3 only because the online fighting scene is much bigger on the Ps3.
In other reviews they zoom down to pixels just to find out PS3′s inferiority on graphics so they can say the Xbox360 is superior.
Now they don’t.
Seriously what?