May 22nd, 2010
Posted in 
“Which Version of Red Dead Redemption Is Our Wild West Winner?”
 |
 |
|
 |
|||||||||
| Rockstar Games |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Rockstar Games |
|||
| Rockstar San Diego | 1 | 1 |
Rockstar San Diego | |||||||||
| Shooter | 600 mb | na |
Shooter | |||||||||
| Release: 05/18/2010 | 19.1 sec | 21.6 sec | Release: 05/18/2010 | |||||||||
| ESRB: M |
Low | Low | ESRB: M |
|||||||||
 |
 |
|||||||||||
 |
||||
 |
 |
|
Head2Head - Red Dead Redemption: Lens of Truth takes a wild ride out West to see which version of Red Dead Redemption wins this Head2Head. Stick around to find out which version should be outlawed! |
|
 |
 |
|||
 |
||||
Lens of Truth took a look at Red Dead Redemption in this Head2Head, presented by Play N Trade, Oviedo, FL. With Rockstar’s long line of open world games, this western based game pushed the genre into the seldom charted era with the style, story, and gameplay you’ve come to expect from the creators of Grand Theft Auto. So saddle-up as the Lens of Truth circles the wagons and analyzes Red Dead Redemption.
Graphics: The overall graphics for Red Dead are quite solid. There never seemed to be a loss of quality in textures from main characters to sub characters or from major environments to inconsequential buildings. The level of quality never wavers. However, from console to console we found differences. We found that while all textures and models looked nearly identical, the Xbox 360 presented at a higher resolution. This led to the overall quality looking slightly better. However, this also helped PlayStation 3. Although resolution was lower, it made shadows softer, and helped give better depth to distant objects.
Performance: While our analyzer was not stable enough to handle Red Dead Redemption, we were able to confirm that the game ran at 30 frames per second on both consoles. We did not see any major screen tearing. Frame rate dipped from time to time, but seemed consistent on both consoles. We believe that the Xbox 360 performed better in a different way, a way that our analyzer would not have noticed. We noticed that shadows had a better draw distance on the Xbox 360. It’s not that shadows were void on the PlayStation 3, it just seemed like the draw distance was shorter, and so in shots such as the ferry boat, you can see the shadows from the docks on the Xbox 360, but not the PlayStation 3. This would come from that the Xbox 360 was able to load more objects per area as well as shadows. This would explain the more obvious difference between the two consoles: the brush. Clearly, the Xbox 360 has twice as mush brush on the ground than the PlayStation 3. Although the differences in foliage is not as obvious as in Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising, it can still be seen in the video and rollover images. This led us to believe that Rockstar optimized the PlayStation 3. They traded out extra brush for equal performance rates.
Loading: Although the PlayStation 3 came with a typical mandatory install, the install was rather small. In five samples of load times, the PlayStation 3 loaded faster than the Xbox 360. The differences are significant enough to believe that the samples are not just flukes.
| PlayStation 3 Load Times | Xbox 360 3 Load Times |
Sample 1: 18 seconds Sample 2: 18 seconds Sample 3: 21 seconds Sample 4: 18.5 seconds Sample 5: 20 seconds |
Sample 1: 22 seconds Sample 2: 24 seconds Sample 3: 25 seconds Sample 4: 24 seconds Sample 5: 24 seconds |
| Sample Average: 19.1 seconds |
Sample Average: 23.8 seconds |
Roll over the image to see the differences. Notice the missing shadow in the PlayStation 3 Version.
Roll over the image to see the differences.
Roll over the image to see the differences. Notice there’s more grass on the Xbox 360 Version.
Roll over the image to see the differences.
Roll over the image to see the differences.
More Roll Overs, Conclusion, Technical Score and Staff Choice on Page 2>>>
Pages: 1 2
Tags: 
which idiot/hardcore fanboy voted for the ps3 version ??
badest port since bayonetta :/
even the loading times are faster if you install it on your xbox360
so 3:0
Yea, definetly the xbox 360 is better, but they are both amazing, so no matter which one u choose, u are going to play an excelent game..
Another thing, u guys test the game without installing it on the xbox 360?, cause u should specify with and without installation.. so we can notice the diference and if we should install it on the hard drive.
I agree,the loading head to head in this site is absurd.
How PS3 wins this loading comparation with the eating gb monster mandatory install?!?
How Sony still aproves that?
How PS3 gamers dont protest against this crap?
I have also a PS3 and if the best game so far Uncharted 2 dont need it why some of the others need this?
Uncharted 2 does do an kinda pseudo-install (notice the long load time at the beginning of the game?) It just deletes it every time you turn it off
, well that’s what I think it does, not entirely sure :S…Also on the back of the box, it says needs 1GB…But i guess the key word in your comment was “mandatory” which is certainly not the case with Uncharted 2.
Great H2H…of course 360 would come out on top.
only a poor twisted shithead will choose PS3 there. its so obviously better on xbox360, people choosing ps3 should be banned for life.
i own both consoles but bought the ps3 version to play with my friends.
the first ten minutes i was pissed off because i knew that the ps3 version has some flaws but after a while the game sucked me in and i forgot about the shrubs and had a lot of fun
but a clear win for 360!
I got the ps3 version as well because of friends.. but regardless of which version you get, shooting your friend’s horses was totally worth the version I got.
wtf? Are you guys that butthurt or what? They stated the game is not unplayable on either console. They both look great and perform well. This is no Bayonetta PS3 like the jackass above mentioned. Some people preferred FFXIII for the Xbox 360 despite it’s ridiculously low resolution (lower than this game!) and worse performance. Did you call them out for that? It’s not the end of the world just because some anonymous people disagree with you. Freaggin’ crybabies.
360 wins this big time, why is it that some ps3 multiplats have less or missing stuff? like a bloom effect in some games, or in this case missing grass (lol), shadows
4 years and we still get substandard ports….im sure they will work out the ps3 one day when they have a 5 year development cycle and an open chequebook.
Didn’t it take 5 years development for this anyway?
Besides, it’s not a matter of ‘working out’ the ps3. The PS3 would take vast amounts of time, and hence money, to optimize for fully. The most cost effective option is to do what’s been done to this port to make it playable.
Remember this is the same engine used on GTA4 (RAGE), so it was never fully 100% optimized for the PS3 to begin with. Yet, they did a good job to make sure this game runs and looks just as well as the 360 which should receive mucho props.
Wait for Rockstar’s Agent and hope to see an engine that really takes the reins of the PS3′s cell architecture.
Highly doubtful seeing as this is the RAGE engine’s creators doing the best they could do with THEIR engine.
If there are no improvements to the engine we can expect L.A. Noir and Agent to be sub HD running at 20FPS with missing textures.
I hope not but keep in mind this was done by Rockstar San Diego. Maybe Rockstar North will do a better job with it and Sony will somehow have key devs such as Naughty Dog and Insomniac step in.
Here’s to hoping that they might be working on a brand new engine though. RAGE isn’t really holding up that well.
Dude Rockstar San Diego built the RAGE engine they developed this game, this was THE best effort they could do with the engine they created?
If you’re saying that its out of the realms of possibility that R*North can’t tweak a multi-platform engine to fit the pro & cons of the PS3 for their exclusive game then I don’t what to tell you.
It’s like saying all games that use the unreal engine will be same.
Okay then yes it isn’t possible for R*North to tweak their “multi-platform” engine to see improvements on PS3 even an exclusive game.
Not so much because it isn’t possible like the Unreal engine but because its obvious now that they don’t want to.
If you install the ps3 version you should install the 360 version as well. This site is so ps3 baised lol it hurts them to give the win to the 360.
I watched some of the ps3 wins and it’s just laughable how they gave the wins to the ps3.
many ps3 games HAVE to install. its mandatory. not an optional feature.
Can’t wait to see ps3 fanboys talk their way out of this one…
Well you could also install it on 360 and have shorter load times.
Either way, Ill get it on 360 but….
It is great ON BOTH CONSOLES STILL.
Definate 360 win, the foliage is pretty bad on the PS3, and the lack of shadow on the ferry pic is off putting.
The actual performance of the game seems to be identical on the consoles, lack of tear and similar frame rates means unless you don’t have a choice on which console to get it on it’s a great experience on either,(at a loss why single console owner’s come to this site tbh )
Maybe someone can correct me, but wasn’t it rockstar san diego that made RDR & rockstar north that made GTA4?
Nice analysis LOT, loving some people’s ironic comments.
San Diego Made this game and the RAGE engine, North Made GTAIV using San Diego’s Rage Engine.
Gotta go with 360. These multiplat games should not even come out on PS3 if so inferior to 360′s standards…delay the PS3 streetdate if that’s what is needed to put on the finishing touches to be on par with 360′s product. Shame Sony,double SHAME!!!
Yeah, becouse Sone made the game LOL.
If you install the 360 version, the loading times are half that of the PS3 too.
And how many MB’s is the xbox 360 install size? Isn’t the difference quite big..I mean ps3 install size is 600MB.
i think that LOT is being too hard with the 360 version in the loading dept. because the 360 version have to load more content, polys, thextures and more elements than the low-res and inferior content in the ps3 version, in addition that the xbox 360 has mores memoryspace to fill, and on top of that this is unjust because they are not testing the game installed on the xbox 360 HDD as they did with tekken, so xbox 360 wins in terms of loading.
Wow… great excuses you have there, Zolrak. It doesn’t matter if the 360 “has to load more foliage.” You look like a fool for giving that excuse. And they never install the 360 version onto the HDDs because there are MANY arcade units out there without HDDs. The 360 won this Head 2 Head. Stop crying about loading times, people. PS3 is faster at default settings. Deal with it.
Again, another great comparison. Have both consoles and agree that the 360 won this game, but no matter what, the game is great for any console…Yee Hawwww!!!!
the lighting and details on the PS3 is better,,, look to prove from the 1:38, the PS3 has an effect of light and shadows on the ground and in women, X360 does not have any effects of light on the woman’s window and floor
“the lighting and details on the PS3 is better”
You don’t know what you’re talking about.
The video, 1m38
I just spot it, very nice. The xbox version doesnt even have the light on the floor. Maybe the sun is not place at the same time ???
The scene is at the same time, this really missing several effects of lighting on X360 version, you can bet that the X360 version has worse lighting that the PS3, all games have better lighting in the PS3, I got X360 and PS3,,, GTA4 Also the PS3 is better,,, images of the PS3 is the same film, the images of the X360 is like the filming of American sitcoms
the lighting does exist as i was playing just before close to sunset and the whole bar had sunlight poking through windows and cracks….i think the 360 intro may be set at a different ingame time or weather effect…this may explain the shadows under the dock part on the ps3…..but it still does not explain the loss of detail in scenery
an effect that the X360 is very bad are the explosions, the explosions of GTA4 and Bad Company 2 on X360 version is ridiculous, the explosions are much better on the PS3
lol digital foundrys comparison of bad company 2 listed 360 having better looking etfects… you love pulling shit out of your ass don’t you?
?
The only thing I recall was that they said the 360 version had slightly better shadow and water effects. But it was nothing compared to the much better alpha blending on the PS3. Artifacts were much more noticeable on the 360.
Some people here must be fucking blind, lol. The 360 version looks noticeably superior in screens shots and that’s without seeing the game in motion on a decent size HDTV, where the divide between the two is even more obvious. As Eurogamer said in their face-off: -
“So, we’re just left with the matter of the final recommendation. We’ve demonstrated conclusively that the Xbox 360 version of Red Dead Redemption possesses higher resolution, improved levels of detail, noticeably superior performance in-game and fewer jaggies owing to a more consistently applied anti-aliasing solution that doesn’t blur the image. Shadows are generally sharper, and of better quality (particularly on the characters’ self-shadows).”
And their final words: -
“In short, Rockstar is to be commended on what is an absolutely fantastic game on both platforms, but the technical analysis is pretty conclusive: if you’ve got the choice of buying the game for either console, Xbox 360 is the version of Red Dead you should buy.”
If you’ve only got a PS3, then I can see why you might get all defensive (even though that’s sad as fuck), but if you have both consoles just buy the 360 version cos it’s the better one in every way (once installed to the hard drive).
HEY YOU!! u are staring to piss me off with with your full of fanboysm and ridiculous comments, if u are so in pain for that….SUE ROCKSTAR!! ++g!!
dude your a fan boy to the max STFU you add nothing of value to ur comments
sorry about the ddl post but that was directed at ZoLRaK
that guy is a complete tool. Look how many of his posts get deleted.
PS 3 is capable of better dynamic lighting but it’s hardly a trade in for the 20% resolution lost.
you are blid…GET GLASSES!!
Dude the xbox version won shouldn’t you be happy I thought you said you accepted when it won but unless its unanimous you wont be happy, whats wrong with you?
You can’t spell… GET SPELLCHECK!!!
this was supposed to be a reply to Zolrak’s get glasses remark above.
The grass on the Ps3 version makes me vomit, how could they possibly leave that be? Great cinematic scenes gets ruined because of those half-assed rendered grass. Yes, I’m actually whining over grass.
Xbox clearly won this one.
lol Xbox fans are the worst EVER.
“LOL there is less bush so PS3 suck !!! And no shadow from far distance ???? it SUCKKKK ”
About the game Best game this year to date ! 2nd GOW 3 ! It can’t beat graphic of Uncharted 2 or GOW3 but the gameplay is SOOOOOOOO NICE ! Dead Eye is soooooooo fun and violent !
And LOL again at Xbox 360 kids xD, this is just about shadow and bush and they talk about bayonnetta xD.
You forgot to mention that the PS3 version has vSync enabled.
Xbox 360 version does not.
This site REALLY needs to get rid of the “like or dislike” system as it’s just being abused by fanboys who want to hide perfectly useful comments.
You can clearly see that it just doesn’t work as Freequebec86 has 4 likes and 1 dislike and he’s just a trolling Sony fanboy.
I agree the ‘like or dislike’ system is flawed, but can you point out the perfectly useful comments that are getting voted down, because most of the ones with a healthy dose of dislikes on this page are deserving of it, though it should go both ways I agree.
lol i’m a trolling fanboy ? xD
What about the “badest port since bayonetta :/
even the loading times are faster if you install it on your xbox360
so 3:0″
and other that got hide ?
Only “hatefull” comment of Xbox KIDS fanboy got HIDE !
You can say that Xbox got better shadow and bush. But you CAN NOT SAY that it’s a failure on PS3.
And i gave you a big thumb down for you dumb comment xD.
Dont bash and you get a thumb up !
I’m sure it’s missing several lighting effects in the X360 version, this game is great you can not do a face to face with a few scenes, RDR has several climatic variations that change the color of scenarios, so it is still early to make comparisons, I I noticed that the PS3 version has better anti aliasing
I don’t know for sure but it looks like PS3 has 2x QAA, 360 has 2x MSAA.. Yes QAA does create a better AA effect, but it also blurs the whole texture in the process.
The PS3 already has a sub-HD scene upscaled to HD resolutions, which would result in blur that’s bad enough. If it has quincunx AA being performed on it as well… well, that’s just a whole load or blur for good measure, or not as the case may be
Kinda hoped the sub-HD resolution would free up processing power to enable msaa.
RockStar could’ve done a better job and didn’t do it
after 2 years since GTA IV launched, RockStar can’t develop an engine capable of delivering the same quality on both consoles
I own a PS3 but decided not to pay RockStar for the reasons I wrote above
I don’t get this not-installing to the HDD business.
Why not?
I install to the HDD, and so does everyone with half a brain. Not only does it speed up the loading considerably, but it makes streaming much better, with less chug and texture pop.
Come on Lens. Get it right. So what if some 360s don’t have a HDD, millions do.
Exactly mate! Especially as you can install any game to any USB stick/drive now.
You can look at this site in one of two ways: -
1. I own both consoles and want as much info as possible so I can decide which version to get.
2. I am a fanboy who just wants to cheer when “my” console wins and get all defensive when “my” console loses.
The site should be aimed at 1, not 2, so they should provide as much information as possible. Scrap the win, lose or tie as that’s fundamentally flawed anyway and just provide straight up information with a conclusion paragraph – and the more information the better.
Here are the loading times for the 360 version when you initially boot up the game: -
From the regular game disc: 22:02
Installed to the hard drive: 12:35
Installed to a Cruzer 16 GB USB stick: 13:21
Installed to a Patriot 16 GB USB stick: 13:04
You’re shaving 10 seconds off and cutting loading times almost in half by installing it to the hard drive.
I’m notbered by the ps3 version being less but I hope rockstar makes some comment on it as it was by no means necessary on technical grounds. It just strikes me as lazy on their part not making both versions to par.
I very much doubt they were being lazy. I would imagine time and money are the main reasons for the ps3 version not matching the 360′s version.
I shall not go into detail as it would take far too much time, but sufficed to say it makes sense to me why the ps3 version is the one that’s lacking. I know about the two system architectures and I’m fully of the opinion that if R* had much more time (and money) they would have been able to optimize appropriately. Considering that the majority of the general public wouldn’t even think there are differences between the two versions means it’s more viable to realise the ps3 version as it is now.
Time and money….you do realize this game took 5 years to develop, also they had 2 separate teams working on each version and they couldn’t get the game to look or run equal?
this time I waited and did some research before buying. 360 version took the the icing and the cake on this one. No contest. I love the PS3 but the 360 has better graphics and higher res. Not only that but the PS3 version forces you to use R2 L2 for firing and aiming… HELL TO THE NAW. 360 version FTW.
Even though I have both consoles, I personally went with the PS3 version to play online with my brother
Keep fighting the good fight, kidice!
The game is clearly better looking on the 360, and it has a higher native resolution, 2XAA instead of horrible Quincunx “blur-fest” AA, plus if you install it, it loads faster too. If you have both consoles, you have no reason to post over and over again defending the inferior version, as you can just play the better one.
just answer a question,,, BC2 and GTA4 has better lighting effects and explosions in which version? PS3 or X360? ^_^
the lighting was equal in those games.
god your butthurt..
Did you guys notice the awful texture pop-ins in the PS3 compared to the 360? Or does the 360 have similar issues and occurs as rampant as the PS3? I didn’t see it mentioned in the article (but I haven’t watched the video yet either) but I think that’s another point against the PS3.
Nonetheless, I have it on the PS3 and though the differences are there, it’s hard to really notice the game while it is in motion.
Texture pop-ins seems to be only a PS3 version problem and its rampant, frankly I find it more obnoxious than the hideous grass.
360 games aren’t installed to HDD because it’s not needed to play the game, where as PS3 has mandatory HDD installs usually so it has no choice to install to HDD.
Also if the 360 version was installed to HDD PS3 won’t be able to win the load time catagories which is usually the main advantage it has over 360 games which is running the game off disc only in these comparisons.
I love my ps3, but this is an obvious xbox win.
I’ll give a hint to the PS3 owners, buy a samsung HD 7200 rpm and put an HDMI 1.3 cable, the colors of the PS3 will increase 40 percent and the rate of loadings will be 30 percent faster,,, no attention X360 owners do this, because the X360 burns very easily LOL
You keep on fighting a losing battle aren’t you?
360 is a clear winner but still pretty much enjoyable on the ps3.
I’m still wondering exactly what is the exclusive hideout PS3 owners get? How big is it and how do I get there? It almost seems R* threw it in there at the last second knowing the PS3 version was not on par with the 360 one.
The strategy guide has two pages dedicated to the hideout. It’s basically an exclusive mission not on 360 where you have to return some stolen gold. It’s available right near the start of the game (check the map that came with the game – it’s south of Benedict Point). Later you can get that gang’s outfit but it’s not that great looking IMO.
This is a pitiful port from rockstar. 1 vote XBOX. Anyone looking for the slightest reason for why the PS 3′s looks better is pathetic.Get over it. Not every port the PS 3 gets is gunna be the same.
Hoenstly, the graphical differences got blown out of proportion on the internet. Yes, 360 is sharper, but its not a big difference like Bayonetta.
wow look at all the ps3 fanboys… gver it 360 is better at multiplats 95% of the time.. cry me a river.
Yeahh… except they’re not.
Yeah if you notice the xbots are bitching much more than the PS3 fanboys, yourself included xbot I mean just look at all of Zolraks comments.
I’m a ps3 fanboy but even I have to admit the xbox version looks better. See I don’t care much for shadows and lighting. Honestly I think those effects can interfere with gameplay. The PRIMARY graphical effect I EXPECT each and EVERY game to have is HD.
If a lazy ass developer drops two versions of a game in my lap, and one of them is sub HD? I would bitch slap/back hand them with the sub HD game.
Seriously, there’s just no excuse for games to be sub HD this gen on HD systems. It’s a complete and total deal breaker for me, so I give the win to the 360 version.
‘Lazy-ass’? I don’t think so.
Get clued up on how different the two console architectures are and then maybe, just maybe, you’ll understand why the ps3 version has come out like this.
I think when people say lazy ass they mean cheap. The engine should have been optimized for PS 3 by now. Look at how close other ports have come with there engines. R* has made no progress regarding.
Ok so I watched the HD video comparison. The additional shadows and lighting DO like admittedly nice on the ps3, but I still found myself glancing over more often at the really nice clean 360 version. The overall picture on the 360 is nicer. Hmm this decision wasn’t as easy as I thought….
Just about 30 fps?
WHERE IS FRAMERATE SAMPLE analysis.
That’s what i expected most.
What a shame.
This game is a total blast! I own both consoles and it was a no brainer to pick the 360 version on this game. KUDOS ROCKSTAR you guys are AWESOME! I can’t wait for DLC!
Rockstar rushed this game out. Obviously, they lead on the 360. The game’s budget was out of control and Rockstar had to deal with lawsuits from employees about overtime.
The PS3 version was intentionally gimped to ensure it ran smoothly. If the PS3 version was full 720p and had huge framerate and pop-in problems, the backlash would be worse.
Of course it was intentionally gimped. It would have been far too costly to fully optimize the ps3 version as you would probably be looking at another half year of development time at least. That’s at a guess, as it would probably be longer. A fully optimized version would require one hell of a change to the code base.
Something to ponder on, though, is that R* have a dedicated technology group dedicated to the RAGE engine development, I believe. RAGE was used for GTA4, hence why the ps3 version of GTA4 has the same nerf as RDR. In the time between the GTA4 release and now, you would have thought there would have been time to optimize the code for the ps3 too by now. However, if it is R* San Diego that developed the RAGE engine, and there is no dedicated dev team for RAGE, then I guess there must not have been the resources available to push the engine forward technologically.
when it comes to graphics wise, xbox 360 hands down. but let not forget, the ps3 has “exclusive content” which is better for the buyer. that why i bought it for the ps3, no regret!!!
The PS3 exclusive content is a top hat and 1 gang hideout. The top hat is nothing to brag about and the 1 gang hideout equates to less than 1% of the gameplay. If you’d buy an obviously inferior looking and performing game because of that, then you’re mad IMO.
I just want to know when a big developer will ever figure out how to work out the ps3 rather than just shipping a bad looking game.
voted for 360, its clearly better graphics on 360. Although I’m glad to see gameplay is intact on both consoles.
Honestly this is down right embarrassing for such a big company ro make such obvious mistakes….that 100 mill was obviously not spent right.
I’m glad I’m not a GTA fan, but damn it…I waited a long time for a good western game and I’m def going to play it:D
I’m grabbing it on ps3, because of friends:)
I dont know how much I’ll be playing it with Super Mario Galaxy 2 and Peace Walker around the corner:D
P.S
Ppl dont ignore Split/Second give the game a chance it is VERY fun and fresh:D
unlike the 1st comment this isn’t a game where it has to load everytime you push a button (IE Bayonetta). This game is every bit as enjoyable on the PS3 as it is on the Xbox 360.
But yes the 360 is the graphically superior version and if you have both system get it for that.
Oh God… Why there is 40 “so smart” sonyboys here? Who the hell cant see clear win of 360 version?
The game is incredible! Mexico is a blast and hunting has never been so fun. Feels like playing Uncharted without any boundaries. A+ game, XBOX 360 for crisp graphics.
ps3 has a more realistic ear placement on the horse in roll-over pic #6
haha.. its a joke. an opinion just as dumb as anyone elses.. oh the 360 is better because the box is green
PS3= better ligth,AA,loading and bloom
X360 =better resolution and foliagen
what is more real :a movie with 500 progressive lines or a game with 720 progressive lines ? ^^
PS3 = movie with 500 progressive lines
X360 = game with 720 progressive lines ^^
I have a PC with a GTX295, I’ll give an example of the resolution is not everything in a game,,,, my GTX295 MW2 wheel with 1920 vs 1080 with all the effects on maximum and 90 FPS, but if I put a resolution 800 vs 600 the game is still far superior to my PS3 or X360 because the effects are much higher than the GTX295,
WHO CARES about what pc u have?..
LOOKING OTHER EXCUSES TO APPLOY YOR FANBOYSM?
i found the bloom to be better on 360
A few inaccuracies with your post
First, it’s the 360 version that has better lighting, loading (install to HD) and AA.
I have compared them both on my TV. PS3 version looks like a movie? I don’t seem to remember movies looking blurry, not to mention movies are now in 720p, 1080p
The Xbox 360 version wins here but the PS3 version is far from bad. Its only slightly behind. I’ve seen on forums people saying the PS3 version is awful. They are clearly retarded. If the PS3 version was the only version with nothing to compare it to, people would say it looks amazing.
“If the PS3 version was the only version with nothing to compare it to, people would say it looks amazing”
well thats blatently obvious
Nice work, guys. I chose the 360 version because I want to play it online, so it was the obvious choice. I was worried I might be missing out on graphics or something, but you’ve cleared up my doubts. Cheers!
Since the analyzer is off I don’t know which version I need to pick up since I don’t rly know which version has or dont have screen tearing and which version has fast frame drops hope the staff can tell me that.