October 7th, 2011
Posted in 
Welcome to the Wasteland…
| System Breakdown | Xbox 360 Stats | PlayStation 3 Stats |
| Resolutions: | Up to 1080p | Up to 720p |
| # of Discs: | 3 | single |
| HD Install: | Optional/22 GB | 8.1GB |
| Metacritic: |  |
|
| Watch / Download Video: |  |
Welcome back for another exciting Head2Head! The time has come for us to tackle one of the most anticipated Head2Heads this year, RAGE! This one should be an interesting one everyone as there is something different with this game when you compare them to the games we analyzed in the past. This time around the 360 version of the title actually states that RAGE will require the game to be installed to the HDD for optimal performance. Even though you still don’t have to install the game, this tells us that the developers created a software that was meant to be played from the HDD on the 360 rather than straight from the disc, unlike other 360 games in the past. Due to these circumstances, we will be giving you the results for installed data rather than un-installed data of the 360 version. The PS3 also requires a mandatory partial install of 8 GB, so this should be a battle for the ages.
Graphics: This has always been something that many couldn’t wait to see. We were told that textures would be identical on all platforms, but this is also something we have all heard before. For the most part, this is very true. Most of the textures in the game are identical and no real difference can be determined. The 360 version does seem to be a LITTLE more clear in some spots, but if you refer to both the screenshots presented here and in our HD screenshot comparison from a few days ago, the difference is nothing that can truly affect the results. For the most part Aliasing remains identical as well. There may be a shot here or there that favors one version over the other, but they happen on both sides and they are pretty rare overall. Even gamma levels seem to be identical with this game, which is a rarity in this generation it seems. The only real difference that we could notice at all was that the PS3 version had softer shadows which, much like the sharper textures in some of the spots on the 360, don’t affect the visuals enough to offer much merit. There were quite a few factors here that were constantly contradicting the advantage in this category, seeing how while one thing might look slightly better on one version, something else would look better on its counterpart. For the most part, both PS3 users and 360 users will be satisfied with this category in the end.
However, there are some noticeable differences when it comes to texture streaming. Both versions suffer from some pretty frequent pop-ins, but it is evident that the PS3 version suffers more. There are a few rollovers below where you can see how bad the PS3 looks by comparison and easily determine that it is taking slightly longer to stream textures in comparison to the 360 version. The good news is that no matter what version you have, they could be worse. Even so, this 360 advantage is the only real noticeable difference that could be found between the two versions, therefore giving a very SLIGHT edge to Microsoft’s console in this category for having a bit more polish.
Performance: The performance aspect of RAGE is a little more one sided. Both versions of the game managed to play the game with minimal screen tearing, so we have good news there. For the most part both versions also played with a frame rate very close to the targeted sixty frames per second. The difference between these two versions boils down to when shit hits the fan in heavy fire fights. Neither version tears in these events, however the 360 version suffers from a noticeable drop in frame rate. The PS3 with a partial install was able to manage a solid sixty frames per second when things got heavy, but the 360 version dropped anywhere from ten to fifteen frames under pressure. The good news is that even at forty-five frames per second, the motions never really seem choppy. When you get right down to it though, the PS3 version is a smoother experience with a solid sixty frames per second in all situations, giving Sony the edge they need to strike back by taking the performance category.
| Xbox 360 Frame Analysis | PlayStation 3 Frame Analysis |
| Clip 1 info: Length of clip: 4768 frames Average FPS of clip: 58.26 Percent of torn frames: 0.02 |
Clip 1 info: Length of clip: 4768 frames Average FPS of clip: 60.0 Percent of torn frames: 0.08 |
| Clip 2 info: Length of clip: 3967 frames Average FPS of clip: 60.00 Percent of torn frames: 0.08 |
Clip 2 info: Length of clip: 3947 frames Average FPS of clip: 59.95 Percent of torn frames: 0.49 |
| Clip 3 info: Length of clip: 2146 frames Average FPS of clip: 60.00 Percent of torn frames: 0.0 |
Clip 3 info: Length of clip: 2146 frames Average FPS of clip: 59.94 Percent of torn frames: 0.13 |
| Global percent of torn frames: 0.07 Global average FPS: 59.23 |
Global percent of torn frames: 0.57 Global average FPS: 59.97 |
Loading: We come to our final category, the load times. With the game software developed and intended to be run from the HDD on the 360, as stated by the development team and stated on the box and after starting the game, the 360 will take this tie breaking category with an eight second advantage. Remember both versions of the software were designed to be installed in this case and in this software analysis we must take this new element into consideration. In the past the optional install to the 360 was offered as a hardware feature to reduce load times and take the load off of the DVD drive. In a software analysis a hardware feature such as this would normally not be a factor in the results. However due to the developers specifically stating that the 360 version of the game’s software was designed to be installed to the HDD, the install becomes a key factor in the results and running it from a disc becomes the option due to how it was actually developed. The same rule applies to the PS3 mandatory install that is implied in software design when the developer feels it is needed. In this case the full install of the 360 version yielded better results than the 8 GB partial install of the PS3 version, giving Microsoft’s console the edge here.
| PlayStation 3 Load Times | Xbox 360 Load Times |
| Sample 1: 33 Seconds | Sample 1: 20 Seconds |
| Sample 2: 29 Seconds | Sample 2: 22 Seconds |
| Sample 3: 25 Seconds | Sample 3: 22 Seconds |
| Sample 4: 34 Seconds | Sample 4: 20 Seconds |
| Sample 5: 26 Seconds | Sample 5: 21 Seconds |
| Sample Average: 29.4 Seconds | Sample Average: 21.0 Seconds |
Rollover to see the Difference.
Move the Slider to see the Difference.
Rollover to see the Difference.
Rollover to see the Difference.
Move the Slider to see the Difference.
Rollover to see the Difference.
Rollover to see the Difference.
Move the Slider to see the Difference.
Rollover to see the Difference.
More Roll Overs, Conclusion, Technical Score, Videos and Staff Choice on Page 2>>>
Pages: 1 2
Tags: *To ensure color accuracy from the PlayStation 3, Xbox 360 and Wii U output, the PlayStation 3 has RGB Full Range set to "Full" and Super White "On", and the Xbox 360 has Reference Level set to "Expanded" and HDMI Color Space set to "RGB". Our capture card we have captured segments from the AVS HD 709 . Blu-ray, HD DVD, & MP4 Calibration suite.
As you will see, each system matches each other at the SOURCE LEVEL. No contrast or gamma settings are manipulated before or after capturing our images/videos. We strongly believe that these types of corrections are done on a individuals preference and should not be adjusted by us. Finally, washed out looking images that are due to contrast or gamma differences will not have any influence on our final verdicts. Please Read through our F.A.Q page if you have any questions or concerns.*
i went 360 because im more comfortable with multi-platform shooters on 360. and the disc swapping, its not like i have to switch discs during the action. like slamming into a wall with the atv and my body is flying thru the air, then i have to put in disc 2 to watch him land.
yes… xbox 360 controllers is for adults. good choice lol =)
@thebutthurts, LMFAO! 360 controller is for adults.. HAHAHAHAHA!!!! Made me laugh.. Thanks for the good laugh man! Appreciate it! Made my day
so what are you saying that ps3 controller are for adults? that made me laugh even more! imagine a grown adult with a tiny controller. that’s just plain childish.
@slade, Lmfao.. Yes.. I’m sure a controller with “A” “B” “X” “Y” or whatever Is completely for adults.. Done learning your abc’s? HAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!! Just don’t bother commenting back, I’d take the PS3 Controller over that awkward to hold, retarded bulky mess ANY day.
what about the shapes on your child’s toy? the triangle, x, circle, and square, they look like pieces and shapes made to fit in a puzzle from a toddler’s toy. you done playing with your shapes? and the 360 controller is only bulky for children’s hands or people with extremely small body parts (hands, feet, and other unmentionable parts! haha! if you know what that means)seeing that the 360 controller are made for a man’s hands. why you mad? cause the genius john carmack showed that the ps3 in the inferior platform after all?
I know where I am, so I wont say that I don’t understand why it always turns into an xbox vs ps3 compitition. This controller debate is useless. Its a subjective decision. SOME people love the xbox controller, and SOME ppl love the dualshock. Its a decision. Fighting over who has the better controller in a thread for Rage installs did make me laugh tho. Thanks guys.
X360 is the vesion to have
There is a much more obvious popup on PS3 and a lot less on X360 even on not installed version!
It seems that low RAM/ split into 256/256 memory pool problem and workaround for that on PS3 where Cell has to recompress buffered textures in JPEGs doesn’t work so well.
(Rage developers on Cell: “The extra cores are assigned to work on textures in the background, as there’s tons of visual data on the blu ray and on the hard drive,” he explained. “We load compressed JPG data, and assign those extra cores to work on these textures, and uncompress them in the background so there is no nasty pop up, or blurred textures.” )
And dynamic resolution scalling is also hitting PS3 version harder: under load it drops as low as 640×720…
“Downscaler at work on PS3 shot.
http://www.nowgamer.com/siteimage/scale/0/0/296052.png
http://www.nowgamer.com/siteimage/scale/0/0/296013.png
“Both have dynamic scaling. Looks like it’s just in the horizontal dimension. In these particular shots, the engine has gone down to 1152×720 for 360 and 640×720 on PS3.
”
So thats why STATIC screenshot captures are more or less EQUAL on PS3 and X360.
But in motion or under load PS3 version go into low resolution and aliases/blur so much more.
Oh my!, that not how my post was looking before mod approval
The part about popup test seems missing.
H2H please do such a test.
Do it like they did at
“MegaTexture streaming comparison was done with default settings (8GB PlayStation 3 install/no Xbox 360 install).”
( http://www.youtube.com/v/yHZXCvjZ-_g )
and additional do it with and without install.
It would be interesting to see if it changes anything.
Of couse do it not only on beggining areas where seems that PS3 has much more visible popup but also on open later stages where X360 seems to have some of it also (smaller though). Does install helps to eliminate it completly or not?
Does faster HDD helps on PS3?
EG made their comparison.
Mostly the same conclusions – however the framerate tests they did shows that PS3 version exacly like X360 one (both very rarely) HAS FRAMERATE DIPS.
Record one was 38fps with screen tear and that was in PS3 version.
This changes your conclusion of this H2H as their videos have shown that both version have very very ocassional framerate drops.
Pic from their video – framerate slipped (on both PS3 and X360) only few times on driving parts with serious explosions on screen.
http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q262/anonim1979/ragefps1.jpg
why 360 always wins?ha?
How can people honestly believe the PS3 version is better? Digital Foundry did an actual review and declared, “Rage is an easy win for the Xbox 360.” That sounds like a blatant fanboy comment, but the differences were so pronounced between the two versions that Digital Foundry felt completely comfortable saying it. So I don’t understand how all of the PS3 fanboys are willingly embarrassing themselves.
Here’s just a couple quotes among countless more:
“The dynamic resolution scaling technology works more effectively on the Microsoft platform, and there are very few instances where you feel or even recognise that you’re playing a sub-HD experience – unfortunately the same cannot be said for the PlayStation 3 where the visual sleight of hand is not quite so effective.”
“Curiously, after repeating the process a couple of times, no matter how we ran Rage – even with no hard drive at all – the 360 would resolve prominent textures faster.”
“…the detail deficit was more pronounced on the PlayStation 3, sometimes alarmingly so.”
“The effect on PlayStation 3 seems to be much more frequent and the resolution drops are significantly more noticeable.”
“Rage on Xbox 360 manages to maintain the illusion of a full high definition presentation even when it is switching between various resolutions.”
“As the Wasteland area is one of the visual highlights of the game this is a bit of a shame as prominent areas of detail on 360 are very blurry indeed on the PS3.”
“The PlayStation 3 doesn’t do this: when a game or demo installs to your HDD, there can be thousands of smaller files (in the case of GT5, up to 44,000 files) which does mean that over time your drive can fragment and drive performance will degrade a lot faster.”
Even the developers themselves have been complaining about the PS3.
“John Carmack talks about the fact that they max out onboard memory and that the split system/video RAM of PlayStation 3 in concert with the bulk of the OS caused some issues for them.”
Wow. That was a great post. With actual quotes that the overpriced internet ready blu ray player fantards won’t be able to dispute!!
ROFL, this turned out as I expected !!!! Oh, and the ps3 fantards were talking trash about how rage would be better on ps3??? ROFL. The overpriced internet ready blu ray player’s fans live in their own little world..LOL. ANOTHER, yes, ANOTHER win for The true gaming machine, the SUPERIOR console, Xbox 360. B A N G!!!!
Wow XBOTS u take this slight win as if this game is proof that 360 is better lol the game truely looks garbage..BF3 will crush RAGE graphically and it will be better on PS3 then UC3 will crush both and it’s only on PS3!
@BIGJOEJGDE It’s pretty funny considering that the U3 Multiplayer looks like crap compared to U2.
@bigjoe
ROFL oh here comes the fantard” you just wait, just wait” argument that you fantards started 5 years ago….well we’re still waiting….”sound of crickets”….
Face it. Xbox is SUPERIOR and always has been. Don’t be mad at the developers be mad at Sony. They let hackers into your personal information to be spread around the globe and they did it with a poorly designed INFERIOR console that is nothing more than an overpriced internet ready game machine impersonating blu ray player. FACT!! I’m glad you agree.
“Xbox is the BEST console EVER made.” –John Carmack
Look like a 360 win there. But I’d rather call it a tie since I don’t consider load time as that important. Definitely would buy the PS3 version of this game though. I’m too lazy to swap discs.
You will be “lazy” with the ps3 pop ups when you turn lol
Zero popin on ps3′s with ssd. ps3 wins. lol at xbox frame rate.
Solid State Drives are too expensive!
Best hard drive for the PS3:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148591
@senis
Wow that’s weak. ” Hey look if I strap nitrous oxide to my ford pinto it’ll run the quarter mile in 8 seconds!!!” Poor fantards. I know you were desperate for this game to be better on the overpriced internet ready blu ray player but the fact is that it’s just too much game for it’s INFERIOR designed hardware. Now excuse me while I play it on my SUPERIOR console, Xbox 360 baby, without the need to buy a single thing to make it better. Tootles.
“Xbox 360 is the BEST console EVER made.” –John Carmack
@THETRUEHURTS
The world pops up everytime I turn lol!
@THETRUEHURTS
But it beats popping the tray open all the time.
If it comes down to frames per second obviously a PC Version should be the choice when offered. The graphics, which is a constant in any game, are really sharp even when it is less than desirable. I give the nod to the Xbox and the wink to the PS3. I’m going Xbox. Both versions are a great addition to the library of lunacies.
At the moment the PC version is the worts, it have serious problems with frame tearing, for me is unplayabe. my PC is a corei5 2500k, 8gb, ati6850 1gb.
If you haven’t already, download the AMD Rage performance drivers. On my rig (PhenomIIX6 1100t, 8gb ram, ati hd6970 2gb) the game is running fine with only some graphical oddities. Also be sure to force v-sync in your ATI Catalysis. Rage, for some ungodly reason, does not even have an in-program v-sync.
By now, Rage PC is the best version. Though it is a bit sad that ID, a company who more-or-less spearheaded FPS PC gaming, released a buggy and incompetent product into the market.
Looks like a xbox 360 win this time.Better graphics,better load times.
don’t be a fanboy you gotta install it on 360 to have less pop in.Ps3 does run 60 fps no slowdown while the 360 has slowdown..Quite sad to see all the 360 fanboys look past the 15 fps diffrence and the fact that every 360 does not have a hdd..sad indeed.
@Riseer. Wow you guys just won’t admit defeat will you? LMFAO!!
It’s said that you overpriced internet ready fantards look past the fact that ps3 manages to keep up it’s frame rate with INFERIOR anti-aliasing, INFERIOR blurry textures, and a M A N D A T O R Y 8 gig, yes did you read that, 8 gig install….while the 360 doesn’t even need an hdd to play this masterpiece….sad indeed.
I like the comment “It drives me nuts when I see a games have more then 2 discs”. You must not be a real Playstation fan then. I remember all the Final Fantasy games on ps1 having 3-4 discs and i would think it was so awesome because that meant the game was going to be long lol
I think you may have made a mistake by installing the game to the 360. The install is not “Required” It’s “Recommended”. Everybody is going to be requesting that you install every game to the 360 in future Head2Heads. In any case this is indeed a 360 win if you have a HDD, The Frame rate however is much better on the PS3 if you can stomach the pop-in.
recommended usually means best. doctors recommend you get your balls checked but you dont have to if you enjoy the lumps
Lens of truth said it themselves.
” This time around the 360 version of the title actually states that RAGE will require the game to be installed to the HDD for optimal performance.”.
If you have lumps you should definitely get your balls checked dude.
im sure the developers would “like” to say its required but since there’s so many different models of 360′s, they have to cater to every one of them.
its the first 360 game to ever say this message. it make it an exception
They still broke their out of box rule with this one. The install should have been an after thought and not factored into the decision. Not everyone has a Hard drive on the 360, What if that person that has no hard drive in their 360 also has a PS3? Would the PS3 version be better? Now we will never know..
So you guys finally test with the game actually installed for the 360 and it ends up winning…now just go back and do it for all the games you tested and you will see that xbox will win most of the time.
And no im not an “xbot”, see my pro-playstation comment above.
I’m really upset how could they promise both system will be identical in a graphic wise, when the first picture of the guy in the cart shows more details in Xbox360 than the one in PS3. some time you enjoy the game due to the details you see in the game.
It would be nice to hear them say this system will have that and system will have that, that’s it. I don’t know what to say. but huge thanks go to LOT for the great H2H.
Dude, did you not read the article? The textures being streamed in, looking blurrier on the PS3 because it’s a tiny itsy bit slower than the xbox 360. If you wait a few milliseconds, the images would look nearly identical. It’s called texture streaming. Something Borderlands also did, and in fact it made some of the 360 screenshots look bad in that game (probably because it was installed on the PS3 but not on the 360). In any case, there are subtle differences between Rage on the two consoles but the main point is that they are pretty much identical graphics wise, just like Carmack said.
Thanks mate. I just sow that in a video somewhere. thumb up for you.
Solid frame rate,DTS 7.1 and 1 disk=PS3 winning.
@resultz
I can see why you’d be inspired by the “solid framerate” from the overpriced internet ready blu ray player, as this is usually not the case. But SUPERIOR anti-aliasing, SUPERIOR texture quality, made possible by SUPERIOR hardware = Xbox 360 winning…oh wait..that’s what this site said too. Hmmm oh you agree now? Well i’m glad you saw the error of your ways.
“Xbox 360 is the BEST console EVER made.” — John Carmack
A slight win for the Xbox 360 version then, but it is to be expected, as the game was fully installed and streamed directly from the HDD. So if one was to play the game right out of the box without installing the game into the HDD, like I believe many people here would (as I clearly remember how they have stated in the past that having to wait for game to be installed instead of being able to jump in and play it right off the bat is atrocious in their eyes), I suppose we can expect the both versions to tie (maybe) in both graphics and loading times.
Either way, when it comes down to performance, the PS3 version is clearly superior here, as it is able to maintain a solid performance throughout the game, whereas the Xbox 360 counterpart would drop as many as ten to fifteen frames under pressure. So, being an FPS, where solid performance (usually) matters much more than eye candies (and minor ones at that), I think the PS3 version is better pick.
By the way, does anyone know whether or not have they fixed the problem with the PC version (a.k.a. the definite version) yet?
If you are using an AMD/ATI card, download the Rage Performance drivers from AMD’s offical site. Also, force v-sync through ATI/AMD Catalysis window.
I have four or so hours into the PC version on my rig (PhenomII X6, HD6970, 8gb Ram) and have only ran into some minor graphical hang-ups such as texture pop in (which, truthfully, might be the engine more so than a glitch) and the occasional flicking NPC. The game also crashed twice…so be sure quick save often.
It seems that ID is more than aware of the problem and are doing everything to help the seemingly ill-fated PC port. I have little doubt that the PC build is the best looking of the three versions, but some of the hoops you’ll have to jump through some stiff hoops to get working well.
Xbox 360, for sharper texture and better contras, and also 1080P
PS3 looks great too
Its not 1080p. 360 can upscale all games to the res. Native res on both versions is dynamic.
Sorry but in this case i´m not buying the Technical Score results.
This is a Tie, because even 360 is loading faster, the diference is about 14 Gigas.
I´m sure if Ps3 has an advantage of a few seconds loading but a 14 gigas mandatory install in some other game, LOT will score the “LOADING” section with a Tie, i can´t understand why you guys didn´t follow the same rule to this analysis.
Normally i´m agree with all the results in the FacetoFace, but this time guys you just did it wrong. (In my opinion)
oye troll VETE A MERISTATION A JODER…TROLL
360 GANA…Y PUNTO
Another XBOX 360 Win. In this EPIC game.
PS3 pop up lol. where is the cell atomic power?
Time to make ps4. But the new xbox will be better ofc.
Sry ps3fantards but the truth hurts =)
PS3 SSD(zero pop-in) > XBOX HDD(pop-in)
i have it for xbox 360 but might switch to ps3 because i have an SSD installed in it, we’ll see…
What is SSD? Just wondering because I never heard of that before
@Traxxx
An SSD (solid state drive) is an alternative to an HDD (Hard disk drive) Which has no moving parts and uses flash memory, giving it much faster read/write speeds than Hard drives, and allowing it to run quieter and cooler, at the expense of a much higher price.
Isn’t thetruehurts meant to be banned because of racial abuse.
@mybutthurts, I’ve gotta admit, You’re one HILARIOUS guy man.. I mean seriously.. You are just a huuuugggeeee JOKE. That’s what you are, Oh and a fanboy in denial. Lmfao, Oh and what happened with Battlefield 3?? Oh that’s right.. failbox got PWNEDD!!!! Lol, Typical xrats. Lol even the next failbox won’t beat the PS3 probably.. So I guess you’re just stuck with failbox for life then. Oh and one more thing.. PS3 Pwned you failbots.. PS4 will just wipe you xrats off of the surface of earth.. Prepare for the ultimate PWN Suckersss!!! XD
The guy above me is the funniest troll I’ve ever came across.
I’m surprised that the 360 has slightly sharper textures and less pop-ins considering the PS3′s 8gb mandatory install. I gave this H2H a tie since the differences are minuscule so you can’t go wrong with either one.
Great H2H and I think you made the right decision installing it. Though imo its a tie as PS3 is just one disc and the performance under stress is better. Plus by default it sounds better if you have the set up.
Hi, I have 2 things to bring up,
1, I think this time around load times should not be included as the PS3 install is 8gb compared to the 360′s 22gb. You cannot fairly compare this and include this in any decision between the 2 copies. Maybe in these cases a comparison with and without an install could be done to give people a better break down of what to expect in both circumstances.
Awesome game though and I am looking forward to playing this. Nice analysis!
2, not this post related but more site related, myself like a lot of my friends use mobile devices and tablets to view this site and the fact that rollovers don’t actually work for us is frustrating. Could a link below each image be added to switch between both versions be added as well as rollovers please!
Yes I do agree TheCornishYeti , we need a mobile site version one, some time I’m in a meeting and I still would like to sneak with my phone under the table so I can reply.
Personally I would have included both the uninstalled and installed 360 versions, but I can understand that might be too time consuming.
I voted tie, since not everyone can install it.
Looking forward to getting this.
sure we go for 360,far better controller,besides its not a big deal the frame rates dropes,45 50 fps still very good!plus the loading and the overall graphics
OK”a verry slight 360 win here”but do you know what’im verry impressed with what they done here with the ps3′ok so its looking a little softer but still looking great”and i kinda like the way the softer graphics look”infact i think id have done a great job on this game for both the 360 and ps3′but it would have been better if id made the install on the ps3 larger to help with the pop up problems’anyway it cant be that much of a problem or they wouldnt have gone with an 8 gb install,i think im gona get this for my ps3 today”i like both my 360 and ps3 but im loveing the ps3 pad for shooter and the whole game on one disc”Sold.
I can’t help thinking this analysis is a bit biased.
How can 360 win in load times when the 360 version is on three discs and swapping is *always* required when switching to and from multi-player mode, even after full installation?
And even require 20GB of HDD space to get a full installation and minimum fuss.
I wish LoD dropped the current win/lose scoring system for each category, or maybe assign max 100 points to each category. For example: 90 for 360 and 85 for PS3 in graphics to indicate that PS3 version is only slightly less polished. That would make it far more detailed and still indicate which version is best.
Agree. This could not be any more biased.
I agree with the scoring indeed would be much better..
But fyi its doesnt require 22gbs .. just install one discs at a time, no its not biased at all – its was build for the xbox version to be installed, they even would have put in an mandatory install on xbox version but ms didnt allow it since not all have HDD..
So fair and square..
Samchez77 complaining about bias.
Oh the irony…
@Samchez77
ROFL yeah where’s that ATOMIC powwa uv da’ cell?? ROFL!! Oh I was waiting for this!!! Overpriced internet ready blu ray players can’t keep up with the SUPERIOR Xbox 360 and this just proved it, AGAIN! I’m really surprised the pitiful overpriced internet ready blu ray player was able to stay as close as it did. LOL
ANOTHER yes ANOTHER win for the SUPERIOR Xbox 360. Yes Samchez77, the overpriced internet ready blu ray player loses AGAIN.
What does swapping have anything to do with load times? :/
lol. Just lol. This time things have sunk to a new low. In the graphics department, the PS3 suffered due to slower loading of textures….Xbox full HD install the obvious reason. The Xbox has faster loading times….again the HD install. However the PS3 still wins on performance. Come on guys….are you sh*ting me? Had you have done this H2H the traditional way…..we all know who the winner would be. The fact that Xbox NEEDS this install to even compete with the slower blu-ray format is proof enough that the PS3 is much better equipped to handle such a heavy game. Lots of Xbox games recommend HD install. And not every Xbox console has a large HD so it is always deemed optional. PS3 fans everywhere are going to feel very ripped off with this H2H. Seriously, all the lengths Id had to go to for this to be quality just shows the Xbox is passed its used by date. HAd the PS3 version been fully installed, the outcome would be very, very different. My god………….
Have you even followed the game’s progression throughout the years ? its has alway been in mind to install on the xbox and no lol it wouldnt be “very different hahah lol”on the ps3 if it was fully installed, seems like your butthurt or something ?..
Gotta love all ps3 dudes in here, keept saying PS3 Will and shall own xbox on rage!! “cant wait too see all those butthurt xbots” etc etc..
Seems like its the quite opposite which is very amusing lol !
yeah and the PS3 versions REQUIRES an 8GB install. Imagine how it would run without it. Its good i have an SSD installed in my PS3 lol
I’m laughing at all of you tards. Arguing over nothing. Laughing hard.
Ohhhh, look at poor butthurt Samchez77. Cry me a river. ROFL. Another SUPERIOR Xbox 360 win!!! ANOTHER, did you get that Samchez77, yes ANOTHER win for the VASTLY SUPERIOR Xbox 360!!!
“Xbox 360 is the BEST console EVER made.” –John Carmack.
John Carmack is an over hyped brain washed XBOT so of course he’d say something like that.
Why did lens of truth break there out of the box rule for this game. The 360 version should be compared uninstalled. This kinda comes across that LOT broke their rules to force a 360 win. Both the texture loading and overall loading is far inferior on uninstalled 360. Who’s to say that if the PS3 allowed full install it would be better than the installed 360. This should be a PS3 win. I’m dissapointed in LOT and it makes them seem biased to 360.
they needed to do this in order to be able to award the win to the Xbox. Its as obvious as dog sh*t on your shoe. They trying to cover it up by stating the developer recommends the install blah blah. Dude, they have always been biased towards the 360 in thier H2H. Get used to it. at the end of the day…..Killzone 3 is still better!!! hahahahahahahah
Cool story bro
It is quite apparent that you are truly butthurt over these results. Don’t blame the LoT staff. Blame Sony and their wonky design inside the hood of the ps3.
256mb vram CHECK
crappy gpu CHECK
slow reading blu-ray disk CHECK
A larger OS footprint compared to the 360 CHECK
The ps-cripple CHECK
Yes the cell is powerful but what good is it when it’s trying to fight to overcompensate and overcome the inadequacies of the asymmetrical internal design of the ps3?
Instead of being able to fly like a free bird and to really take the ps3 to great heights the cell is being suffocated by the internal design of the hardware.
No matter what there will always need to be some kind of trade-off made with the ps3. Not that there aren’t any trade-offs to be made on the 360 but with the ps3 you have to do it more.
@TRAXXX
“256mb vram CHECK
crappy gpu CHECK
slow reading blu-ray disk CHECK
A larger OS footprint compared to the 360 CHECK
The ps-cripple CHECK”
Yeah man, whatever you say.
Check this crap out and start to cry:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jLv6pR6ZSk&feature=player_embedded
P.S. CHECK
A scripted, linear movie with little control mixed in with cheap- *** quick time events.
Not to mention the fact that the multiplayer graphics look like a** compared to the SP. Hmmmm I wonder why the graphics take such a hit in MP.
Meanwhile a game like Gears 3 stays consistent whether in Sp and MP.
Hell the Gears 3 MP graphics rival some of the uc3 SP graphics. Chew on that for a bit.
Not to mention that the fire effects and smoke look like complete donkey a** that looks like something from a high rez ps2 game.
By the way I played the subway demo. It’s a jagfest!
Oh but you’re right forgive me there are no trade-offs!
“the Gears 3 MP graphics rival some of the uc3 SP graphics.” Yup, it’s official you have absolutely no idea what the hell you are talking about. You are such a fuck*ng fanboy. You can sit there and talk shit about Uncharted’s linearity and yet you praise Gears Of War? seriously!? There’s something wrong with your head and BTW, I love the Gears of War series, great games but Uncharted has so much more depth as a whole it isn’t even funny.
LOL Yeah. Keep pretending you know jack sh*t about console hardware. You didn’t even know what SSD was. LOL
So what!? And?
Guess what Einstein… I don’t proclaim to be some engineer or a complete tech head but ya know people can learn and read up on stuff. Ever visit the Beyond 3d forums? Lots of intelligent people over there. You’d be amazed how much you can learn by asking a few questions.
And I know all I need to know that the ps3 hardware is asymmetrical in nature creating a bottleneck.
Me not knowing about SSD is a separate issue and isn’t integral for one knowing about the raw specs and internal design of the ps3. You fail. Try harder.
The cell cpu can do graphix better than the 360′s gpu and that’s without the ps3′s gpu.
@RESULTZ
How many years of game developing experience do you have?
Proof?!
And let’s not forget that Uncharted doesn’t even require a mandatory HDD install…
…oooppsss… slow Blu-ray… yeah.
Let me ask you something…
Is uc3 trying to run at 60FPS with the size and landscape of environments being shown in Rage? Rage technically and graphically speaking takes a dump on Jagcharted 3 which is a grainy mess that can’t even maintain good visuals in MP LMAO. Graphics king my a**
Oh yeah how are those preschool BB gun sound effects going in uc3? Yeah more trade-offs for the Fakestation 3.
By the way nice ground texture here by the so-called graphics king…
http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/286/uncharted3beta2.jpg
@Traxx
No it doesn’t. Rage looks like utter crap on consoles. Played it on 360 but own the PC version, glad I made the right decision.
4k textures, that look like blurred crap,
http://www.geforce.com/Active/en_US/shared/images/articles/ragetexturetweak/RageComparison-Animated.gif
no AA and dynamic downscaling.
It’s the same technological shit as COD (also runs at 60fps) sans megatextures.
I was utterly disappointed by the console build, especially as all pre-viewers were praising the graphics to the heavens.
Game won’t sell anyways, people saving for BF3, MW3 and those few little games between now and the end of the year.
Visually U3 takes a long, smelly dump on Rage
It’s not like you could tell the difference between Naughty Dog-30 fps and generic 60 (or 45-60 fps in 360′s case) fps anyways ^^
@traxxx, No need to be jealous you failbot.. Maybe ONE day failbox will be able to get a game like Uncharted 3.. HAHAHAHAHAH!!! Who am I kiddin? Pffft.. Silly xbots.. UC3 takes a gigantic HUGE smelly dump on all yall xbots! UC3 = Best game EVER, Period.
Ahhhh, poor little butthurt overpriced internet ready blu ray player fantards.
“The Xbox 360 is the BEST console EVER made.” –John Carmack
The problem for me here(and surely millions off others) is that i only have a 3 year old xbox 360 arcade with no HDD(also have a 250 gig ps3 slim) so a full install is not an option for me.
So for people in my position the PS3 is technically the winner but overall a very close head to head and id software deserve great credit.
” The PS3 with a partial install was able to manage a solid sixty frames per second when things got heavy, but the 360 version dropped anywhere from ten to fifteen frames under pressure. ”
*****Could you SHOW that?****
Because you comparison video show sh1ts now, not drops. 60fps all the time.
When you do DO capture screenshots. Its nice to know if the PS3 doesn’t drop frames because it runs then in 640×720 or similar when X360 got “stuck” on higher resolution and thats why it drops frames (and that is a bad thing (bug?) – like problems on PC with too agressive profiler – not agressive enough profiler that should drop horizontal resolution and it don’t do so).
Also do a popup test like thae one I linked before. Stand and spin in place – both on installed and not installed version if you could.
NICE H2H
firt thing to mentin here:
if you install all 3 disc you only need disc 2. no swapping.
xbox 360 looks slighty better, with more details, shadows lok better on ps3, BUT in the 360 version you can say more shadows in the distance, wich doesnt happne on the ps3 version. the 360 has less pop in. and loads much more faster.
so this is a slight 360 win. not by much. but anyway both versions look great!
Nit picking I think hes nicely saying to his fello staff member who ran this analysis your full of s@&t.
LoT lie.
1-PS3 has better colors
2-PS3 has better shadows
3-PS3 has better contrast
4-PS3 has better performance
5-PS3 has better draw distance and AF
6-PS3 has better brightness
7-All X360 can install Rage on HD of 4 gigs?????
8-I have HD 10000 RPM on PS3,my performance is 2 times better.
http://www.product-reviews.net/2011/10/05/rage-720p-review-ps3-vs-xbox-360-retail-screenshots/
http://modernxgames.blogspot.com/2011/10/comparacao-grafica-ps3-vs-xbox-360-rage.html
No it DOESN’T
http://www.gameblurb.net/featured/versus-rage-screenshot-and-megatexture-streaming-comparison/
Also did you bother to look at those screencaps in full size that you linked?
Did you by chance seen aliasing (jaggies) on PS3?
You want to know why?
Beause some of those screens are in 640×720 or so – both PS3 and X360 dynamicaly alter horizontal resolution. PS3 do it more = more jaggies.
Props to the PS3 for the stable frame rate as that seems to be an issue with many multi-platform games on Sony’s machine. In the end though I just really prefer the sharper textures on the 360.
360 versión looks better
You can tell from the screenshots it looks better on 360.
I’m surprised by the framerate difference at times, but as this game is based at 60fps, i don’t think the framerate drops will be as noticeable as games that are locked at 30fps and start to drop.
Nice to see certain ps3 fanboys starting to whinge about the 360 win lol.
It wouldn’t be the internet without the crybabies out in full force
Couldnt agree with you more
its actually very amusing to see ps defense force (no offense), and you guys kept saying “rage will be the best on ps3, cant wait too see the xbots cryin’ etc etc( which comes from dialga, nigil etc etc you know the rest).. im no fanboy but damn, the cows self-ownage is surely very fun too watch right now !! 
Anyway its an impressive regardless which version to get ! its awesome !
Not sure if this has been posted so far:
Check this out, if you want to know how a SSD-Drive boost’s up texture-streaming on the PS3.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsunRUJQpdc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OY15YCcH7XM&hd=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6fhc65C4AM
Sure, this is no reason to go out and buy a SSD-Drive for your PS3, but if somebody already has a SSD-Drive in his PS3, this could give the PS3 Version the edge…
(I am an owner of an SSD-Drive :ppp )
yes bro,,,PS3 with SSD rules,,,all games better on SSD,for exemple:
GTA4,GT5,Fallout3,Crysis2,Oblivion,Infamous2,Rage,Crysis1,RE5 etc..
LOOOL gta4,RE5,crysis2,crysis1 and rage better on ps3? HAHAHAHAAHA
omg you went to far this time.
If i put a sdd on my 60 gb ps3 model i easily get the ylod hahaha.
super!diot, I see you’re having a hard time accepting the facts as usual huh? PS3 is better, Get over it. Oh and btw.. Yeah “If i put a sdd on my 60gb ps3 model i easily get the ylod hahaha.” LOL! Is that so? Cause xbox exploded during crysis and GTA 4.. And no, It wasn’t the “old
xbox… HAHAHAHAH Lmfao, Epic fail for you. PS3 better as always.
Thanks for the links! I’ve been curious as to how a SSD drive would perform installed in a PS3. I can definitely see some improvement, but what really stood out to me is that even with the the SSD streaming the game, I notice far less pop-in on my installed 360 copy. It’s actually pretty rare when it occurs. At some point I need to try out the PS3 version so that I can see the difference for myself on the stock PS3 drive.
I told you that they both had screen tearing but the PS3 tore slightly more. I saw it with my eyes.
Nope it was a glitch in the Matrix, you actually saw it through your nostrils (jk).
I’m sorry, but this head to head ridiculous. LOT is looking pretty hypocritical. Don’t get me wrong, I absolutely appreciate what you guys do, but where is the uninstalled results? If this head2head was to be fair based on your own rules, the tests should have been done “Out of the box” with no install unless actually “required”. The 360 install is optional no matter how you look at it. You say that because Carmack said that performance wouldn’t be as good unless installed, that makes it ok to change the rules? Well then, how about we all email developers and ask them if contrast levels should or shouldn’t be adjusted on PS3 games, or our picture will take a hit. If they say that you absolutely should adjust those levels for an optimal experience, will you do that? I’m pretty sure there have been several games where you could have made the games look nearly identical with a few tweaks of the in game menu, but the “out of the box” rule prevailed.
All developers say their games should be installed on the 360, it’s a fact that they all gain at least a marginal increase in performance. Just because Carmack tried to cover his ass by saying if you don’t install you’ll have a bad experience, the rules suddenly change? Not everyone has the room to install Rage, whereas every single PS3 has enough space for the install. If even one person can’t install Rage, then this comparison is for nothing. Personally, I feel that the scoring should have been done “out of the box” with a mention of how much better it performs when installed. Counting the installed performance in the official head2head, it just looks bad.
All that rambling aside, I bought the 360 version, lol. HAPPY DANCE!!!! Once again, I genuinely appreciate what you do and base 90% of my platform choices on your head2head’s. I’m simply stating my opinion.
@deathrattlehead. I could not agree more. This H2H is constructed garbage. To be honest I always expected the Xbox to edge out on this one, seeing as how many years Crapmack has been in bed with M$. But a FAIR win, not this change the rule change bullsh*t. I’m sorry LOT, you have lost a lot of street cred with this one. Even as an Xbox owner aswell, I feel this is a very unfair win and an out of the box H2H needs to be done for all those people out there who will struggle to fit the MASSIVE 22gig on thier HDD’s. Don’t change the rules to suit your own subconcious Xbox fanboy ways. I have been a tech head since I was old enough to hold a screw driver and use a soldering iron. The Xbox is an AWESOME machine, but its quality and performace fails in comparison. I think its about time a third party group develop another comparsison website. Only a matter of time.
360 it is then.
May be…
…and of course, unless you don’t own an XBox 360 with no HDD or with a 4GB HDD.
You forgot to mention the DOF on the ps3 version that the xbox version lacks
@DIALGAMARINE
lol
“We’ll wait for the H2H Android and Reptile. Just get that moltrin ready to deal with the severe level of butthurt you’re going to feel afterwards.”
The 360 has the edge, but you really can’t go wrong with either version.
I’m getting the 360 version today, I might pick up the PS3 version later.
@REPTILE360666 PS3 fanboys been preaching about Rage being a triple A title, which was gonna own 360 for the past month. Now it’s not fair, because it was installed on the hard drive. So they are gonna cry foul, or remain hush hush.
who owns an Xbox 360 with HD 4 gigs??
I want to see the test version of the Xbox 360 without installing
Well actually you can get and 250gb hd for the xbox for 80 bucks so thats not a problem
well I have SSD 10000 RPM on PS3.
PS3+SSD=faster streaming textures and loadings.:D
An SSD 10000RPM?
Wow!
Does it have a built in 10 meg pipe?!
pssst, SSDs have no moving parts, therefore no RPM.
You a lier lol and btw SDD dont resolve the problem. the game installs only 8gb… the other´s 20gb will simply load from drive.
Oh really? Just 80 bucks? Is that for the original model or the slim, since you know, they now have two different PROPRIETARY harddrives for their system?
Please… I can get a 1TB or maybe even more with 80 bucks.
Yeah, and also, why do I have to spend 80 $ plus the price of the game?
The grand total equals almost a brand new XBox 360… LOL.
After playing this game for a couple of hours on PS3 i’m really not that impressed, apart from the really annoying texture streaming, their seams to be no dynamic shadows in the game only painted shodows on the textures. As for the graphics, I can honestly say I’ve seen better on both consoles.
“You won’t be disappointed with either version…”
LoT has it SO wrong here. The PS3 version’s texture pop-in is far, far, far and away worse than the 360′s (as one of their staff correctly notes in his concluding blurb). I know this because I played several hours of the PS3 build until I got too disgusted with the texture problems and got the 360 version.
Performance > graphics.
Even if the graphics are 99.9% identical, performance is key in a game. Choppy framerates are terrible (look at F1 2011 on the PS3 – people kicking off due to choppy fps).
How this can be anything but a PS3 win is beyond me… unless of course you enjoy choppy framerates.
Lol I bet all those 360 fanboys were sweating after the performance results. That was one lucky win and it was only due to the loading category which would always make thm cry whenever the PS3 took that win. Hell, the 360 had better win considering the MASSIVE 22GB installation that the developrs recommended (a term that should be used on all 360 games lol). Withbout an installation, the PS3 would destroy the 360. With an optional FULL installation on the PS3, it would destroy the 360. Lol just look at that frame rate. They weren’t kidding when they said the PS3 wuld be better in that department but all you 360 fanboys shut your ears, shook your heads and continued to tell yourself that it wasn’t true. Lol
Anyway, this is a straight up PS3 win. Multiple discs is two generations old (bu bu bu teh Final Fantasies!!) And the better frame rate outweighs anything else. Enjoy your R E C O M M E N D E D 22GB installation and swappalooza fiesta guys! Lol
Oh, forgot to mention that I’m not actually interested in buying this game. I may try it at some point. I really do just to see what’s with all the fuss about the graphics and frame rate (frame rate being pretty damn good I admit). But yeah it’ll definitely be the PS3 version as the 360 version just feels cheap in comparison.
DVDs really are starting to show their age.
Yeah, that difference of 0.74 fps on average is completely game breaking.
“Neither version tears in these events, however the 360 version suffers from a noticeable drop in frame rate. The PS3 with a partial install was able to manage a solid sixty frames per second when things got heavy, but the 360 version dropped anywhere from ten to fifteen frames under pressure.”
Of course you would point out the smaller looking difference. lol
A 10-15FPS drop in frame rate is pretty noticeable, especially on a 60FPS game.
The drops would have to be incredibly rare for the average framerate to be so close.
The way I see it, it’s like Crysis 2. Except overall, the PS3 always runs at a rock solid frame rate over the 360.
First i have to sai that i won’t buy the game because i’m saving my money for better games coming this and next month. But from what i see is more of a tie (except loading). Both seem to have texture loading problems and performance i don’t think you will notice the frame drops that much. I have to sai its a good tie because both have there own pros and cons that make you think witch is the best, the 360fanboys are wetting there pants to much because of 8 seconds of loading. Seeing the comments they post right now is just another amazing faction of the fanboy mind and how its works. While here there acting all tuff on the battlefield 3 beta comparison they war going crazy and crying because more people thought the ps3 version was somewhat better. So i would sai ignore them as much as possible because there more ”bots” then users giving there opinions.
Darn LoT. I thought you were above this? Fully installing the 360 version, and going against your entire Out of the Box policy? For shame. I guess this site really is a group of 360 fanboys. What a pity. I actually enjoyed visiting it.
Either way, I’ve been playing the PS3 version, which is superior by fact, and not Biased BS. Enjoy the win Xbots. This game still doesn’t compare to Uncharted 3.
To be honest, it’s good this was a 360 win, and hopefully BF3 is a tie. When your console is in last place, in terms of actual exclusive games and overall quality, you need to boast H2H scores and parade multiplats around as if they’re exclusives so you can feel better about your inferior console. Have a nice one, Xbots.
@ dialga
So much for your blabbering about being superior on ps3 huh ?
Btw take a look on this
http://www.gamerzines.com/xbox-360/news/battlefield-3-360-texture-disc.html
“it’s not yet known whether the PS3 version of Battlefield 3 will also include the same hi-res textures on the Blu-ray disc.
We went hands-on with both versions of the game yesterday, and in terms of visuals, the Xbox 360 version certainly took the edge over the PS3 version.”
Sure, they will match up no doubt but at the moment – its seems the box takes the lead, tho it shouldnt be a surprise if ps3 took that one since the got very good at gettin frostbite 2 ps 3
But people shouldnt be blabbering about which version thats best when we have seen nothing, not that your sayin that now – but you have multiple times so far, and rage come right back at you
And your doing it wrong fyi
okay seriously? the reason they installed it was because the DEVELOPERS stated that it was the way it was meant to be played. (it says on the box, in the manual, and in-game before and after you start a new game) if you don’t like it then lets try this then. we’ll find some PS3 hacker, have him make the game run without the mandatory install (since that’s not “out of the box”) and we’ll see just how well it runs!
and honestly I’ve been hoping they’d add a section for 360 installs. in fact they should have it graded by PS3, 360, 360 installed since it would be the most FAIR way of doing it and give the consumer a much higher understanding of what you can expect from any way to play.
though personally I think that it should be a tie. a 15 frame drop during heavy firefights should have weighed more than the 8 second quicker load time but the slightly sharper textures and quicker hyper-texture threading should have evened it out.
and are you really prattling on about exclusives again? both systems have great exclusives that can’t be compared (honestly, exclusives are exclusive for a reason, they don’t have anything comparable on any console.) saying one is better than another is just silly.
Dialgamarine why do you have to be such a fanboy loser? Why cant you enjoy all systems and their individual strengths. I mean im sorry your mom can only buy you the PS3 but you dont have to bash every other console.
You know what…I sort of agree with Dialga Marine on LoT’s sudden change of heart in regards to out of the box. If LoT’s has no problems with mandatory installs…perhaps they should install a SSD into their PS3s.
With the patching both from the publisher and AMD, I’m playing the PC version which can probably be called definitive by now. Amazing looking title, though the actual game seems a bit safe and uneventful. Actually really liking the car combat scenarios, just a good shift in the pacing. The gunplay has some weight to it, which feels decent…but every quest seems to be a fetch quest that leads to another fetch quest.
LOL cernaml and viagraMarine, those bitter tears are there for all to see
It’s better on 360, nothing to get too upset about.
It has better visuals, less pop-in, less screen tearing and the same framerate basically for the majority of the game.
There’s some areas where it drops frames more than the ps3 version, but with the ps3 versions scaled down visuals, that’s not really a surprise.
I remember crysis on my old pc when i used to go from high to medium settings.
The pop-in showed a massive increase going to medium, but the framerate was far better.
I’m glad they didn’t scale the 360 visuals down just to get some extra speed
360 win.
Considering I have both consoles and prefer to get it on the PS3 really shows how much I give a damn about the 360 “winning.”
3 discs is an automatic failure. A lower frame rate (something you guys would ALWAYS point out on the PS3 version of ANY game even if it only drops like 2 frames from time to time lol) is obviously inferior to a more solid one.
It’s nice to know that even with the PS3′s installation which is like 1/3 compared to the 360′s MASSIVE R E C O M M E N D E D (lol buying) 22GB installation, it still holds up pretty damn well.
@Cernaml OMFG you whine alot haha
its an obvious win for the box, whether you like or not deal with and btw for your information ,You can install one disc at a time, no need for the rest and disc 3 is only multi so nothing to worry about – seriously you make ps3 fanboys look very bad..
Its a great game no doubt, you cant go wrong with either version. plain and simple!
While we are at it :
http://www.gamerzines.com/xbox-360/news/battlefield-3-360-texture-disc.html
It’s not yet known whether the PS3 version of Battlefield 3 will also include the same hi-res textures on the Blu-ray disc.
We went hands-on with both versions of the game yesterday, and in terms of visuals, the Xbox 360 version certainly took the edge over the PS3 version.
Another smack for the cows ? ? only time will tell,,
Already confirmed that the hi res textures are on the single blu ray disc that BF3 ships on.
It’s also confirmed, and has been for ages, that the PS3 version looks better than the 360.
LOL So you’re telling me that after you finish one disc you delete the installation and install the next disc before you play the other half of the game? So when you want to go back you delete disc two’s installation and reinstall disc one? LOL! That’s worse than just swapping without an installation! That’s worse than MGS4′s installations between chapters! Oh man and they say that the PS3 is crippled! LOL!
@CERNAML
or if you wanted to (but why would you?) you could install disc two and leave disc one on the disc allowing you to play the entire campaign without having to ever switch discs…also what was that system that had 3-4 discs per game? oh what was it…it had final fantasy 7 on it…oh yeah the playstation!
and I’m sure you loved it! XD
Guys”ive only been playing a little into the game on the ps3 and im trying to fined problems with it”ok theres a pop up situation like LOT say’but really its not a huge offput”the first time you see it you like ouch!but really it stops being anoying after a bit”it would be good if id and sony allow us to install 95 percent of the game to maybe fight this”but again not a huge problem,but i have to say the photo of the skulls being blurd out on LOT screenshot on ps3 dont look like this”its only when your halfway from zooming into your gun sight this happens’to be honest its crystal clear on ps3′on my average priced LG tv it looks better than ANY OF THE LOT SHOTS HERE”and thats includeing the 360 screenshots,maybe its my average priced tv?who knows.
Will LOT Give me a smackdown if i upload a ps3 screenshot on here lol;]and if its ok how on earth do i do this?the reason being that my screenshot is better lol;]eheheheh”its the part with the skulls”i took a shot with my cam”and it looks Awsome;]
It’s also RECOMMENDED that you use a plasma display with your PS3 LOT, I bet you guys play on lame LCD’s lol, What a JOKE this head to head is, 360 was gonna get murked but oh hang on a minute we better fully install and act like because someone said it was recommended, Our rules OUT OF THE BOX don’t matter, Get screwed, I actually liked this site. You ruined it with ads now you ruin it with crap like this, Pathetic.
Ps I’ve been playing this game all morning and it’s balls lol. Nice framerate, but so does Pong on my glass top cabinet…LOL
The screenshots are captured directly from the source, NOT the TV.
I do agree that it’s a terrible Head to Head though. Goes against everything they have done in the past.
Typical fanboy behaviour.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zP8hk3PlufM&feature=related
i think LOT should of just installed one of the xbox 360 disc, it would only be fair, 8gb install vs 8gb on xbox, that would of been more fair for the ps3 version and this head2head would of been a tie, also this results doesn’t give a clear knowledge of how rage will run on my xbox 360 with 20gb hdd (witch i can only use 13gb). personally after watching the reviews i think ill pass on this since the campaign is somewhat short for an RPG and the multiplayer doesn’t make sense, an fps mp would of been better but no its a racing mp. cant wait for the bf3 head2head….
It doesn’t matter if they only installed one disc. They were playing off disc one, so by installing disc one, they would have installed all the textures. The result would have been the same. The PS3 still runs better.