November 2nd, 2011
Posted in 
Welcome back for another exciting Head2Head! This week we take a look at the “reloaded” classic of GoldenEye’s 007. As you may know, GoldenEye 007: Reloaded was released for the Wii last year. Yesterday, Activision released the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 versions, but with upgraded graphics, new multiplayer modes and tons more gameplay. Jump in and see which version takes the GoldenEye trophy!
Rollover to see the Difference.
Move the Slider to see the Difference.
Rollover to see the Difference.
Move the Slider to see the Difference.
Mouse over the image to see through our “Lens”.
Rollover to see the Difference.
Move the Slider to see the Difference.
Rollover to see the Difference.
Move the Slider to see the Difference.
Mouse over the image to see through our “Lens”.
Pages: 1 2
Tags: 
Just LOVE 007 games. =D
1st photo – First thing that stood out is the Dial Pad on the Telephone (or is that a shooting range). Buttons on 360 seems to be more noticeable.
Just wondering if LOT can do a side-by-side with both PS3/360 and also the Wii version from last year for kicks, kind of like the Battlefield 3 comparison HD install pack vs no install pack
I know the graphics are supposed to be slightly updated from last year, but it still looks like a Wii game.
As per usual the Xbox version is sharper than the overpriced internet ready blu ray player version.
“Xbox 360 is the BEST console EVER made.” –John Carmack
Congrats. 360 has the superior looking Wii Port AYE SIR!
“Microsoft is deffending an inferior technology” – Rob Dyer
Ah yes. Only the Winter warmer for the welfare machine can pump out sharper graphics for a budget title. lol
“Some studios say they are going to have the same quality across all platforms, which is to say you take the weakest platform – the Xbox 360 – and you have the same crappy textures for the Playstation 3 and the PC.” – Daniel Oberlerchner
Overpriced lol its the same price as an xbox u dumbass. Also the game looks exactly the same .on both consoles
“xbox version is sharper”
Please enlighten us all on how exactly the shitbox is “sharper” than the PS3. Not to say that the PS3 didn’t have it’s faults form the looks of this comparison, but it damn sure didn’t have any less than your shitbox. Yet again, your comments make no sense. Just another typical Xbot, claiming bullshit early, but I guess one can’t expect that much from your type.
On a side-note, it’s good to see that you’ve stopped commenting from your several alias accounts. The PS3 community certainly missed seeing your ‘rib-tickling’ inquiries. Good to have you back.
@ BUYING1999
I did not see any comments from you in the Battlefield 3 H2H. What gives?
You’re such a retard, I can’t believe you’re still using that quote.
“BUYING1999 will never get laid” – Hig1134
The ps3 is clearly overpriced, because $250 is far more money than $300 + $60/year…
Another easy win for the PS3! Nice….:)
shitty graphics…..
another loss for ps3………….. just kidding fanboys
a perfect tie and a very stupid game
Just so you guys know, the game is only stupid when the 360 doesn’t win.
The Xbox looks a tad sharper, but overall it’s a tie. These small difference are impossible to notice during the game.
At first I really couldn’t see any difference but as you go further into the pics you see the 360 starting to separate by a hair with an ever so slightly sharper picture. The “money shot” if you will is the rock structure by itself on the 2nd page.
Yes you probably will not notice or even care about these differences regardless of what platform you play on but if I must choose based on these shots it’s the 360 that gets the nod.
360 win, but an abnormally decent activision port onto ps3. 360 has sharper and more detailed textures close up, but reasonable job overall.
if i thought the mp would continue to exist a week after this was released, but it wont, so not buying this on either format. There’s better fps sp campaigns out there no doubt, as activision made this game
Looks like it’s someone’s first time programming for PS3 – What did they buy, a devkit from 2006? It looks like they’ve gone and applied quincunx.
ps3 is blurry as shit
its not that bad. remember, youre looking at these images from very close up, but at a normal distance, you wouldnt notice really. No doubt 360 is sharper though
Yeah that’s it. Screen shots can be misleading as you really notice the defects such as blur when still and side by side in a H2H situation. But yeah, easy 360 graphics win.
you can thank QAA for that , but i think it really depends on how you like your games the ps3 version looks blurry but it has less jags and looks a little smoother
No one should take this site serious, they set the PS3 to RGB full……Which washes out the colours, ruins detail and the black levels…. NO ps3 should ever use RGB full UNLESS you have a very old TV or use a monitor.
Lol 90% of the time this site doesn’t use rgb.set at full its normally on limited. Also older tvs can’t handle full rgb as the dont proccress as many colors as these newer tvs. Rgb actually makes the color output of ur newer tvs better instead of using half of the possible color palette it uses all available colors the ps3 can output
360 tad sharper is all down the LENS of truth using RGB full LOL. Idiots.
dont talk utter, utter rubbish.
Why is anyone surprised these days when cross platform screenshot comparisons look better on 360?
The 360 wins 90% of them i’d say, it’s got to a point where questions need to be asked if the ps3 version comes out looking better lol.
That’s just the way it is and this is another 360 win
Totally agree , and I’m not being a smug, condescending t**t when I say that, unlike you lol
Most smaller titles, unless they ps3 led , always going to have advantage on 360, as not worth while developers investing large amounts of money to optimise engine, for minor differences.
This is actually half decent considering its small title, but easy 360 win, but I only owned ps3 , I wouldn’t be bothered by differences
@Blandroid123
Your desperate need for shitbox head-to-head wins, are starting to become more noticable than, the very screen shots you’re comparing; I guess you and the rest of your sickafant shitbox fan-nerds, need these so-called “wins”, after the embarrasment that took place in the battlefield 3 head-to-head… It’s quite sad, actually; Now you and the other 360 fan-nerds have resortted to just blirting out “wins” whenever possible… I do believe “going off the deep end” has reared it’s ugly head on you people; Seriously, GET OVER IT!!! Uncharted 3′s graphical beauty is now in effect, and the system wars is at it’s end… You fan-nerds should take this opportunity to exit stage-right, silently, while you still have your dignity intact…
And here we have it again, the angry ps3 fanboy attacking the 360 fans because the ps3 lost and the 360 fans are rolling in it, even if it is a small title. Whats pathetic is that you have to come in and shout at them because you claim to have the better system when clearly you don’t. Whats funny is that ps3 was lead platform for BF3 and had the most work done on it and even still the difference was minor. It was debateable who won because 360 had the better textures, although the ps3 had better effects so it comes down to preference. It was very close and infact should have been considerably better on ps3 as dice claimed they took advantage of all SPEs and had specific techniques on ps3. But the game isn’t even impressive. I played the beta and the water doesn’t even ripple when you shoot it. Now that is pathetic. I’ve seen much ‘crapper’ games with water that ripples. Even call of duty looks more polished and i’ll admit COD has bad textures and is just a big fake image full of parallax mapping to cheat its way up, but even it looks cleaner than BF3 despite BF3 being leagues ahead in how it was developed and from a technical stand point, but I just don’t think much of it. And the full game is marginally better than the beta but it isn’t really that noticable which is why I’m not buying it, plus it’s full of COD players so full of camping. If you took a good quality game with top notch physics, graphics, open ended, good AI, colouring, lighting effects, particles in explosion and water effects like Crysis 1 which recently came out on consoles, then you’d see a real game made by devs who know exactly what they are doing. And that game looked AND performed better on 360. And don’t throw uncharted in there, it’s full of pre rendered scenes. A graphical cheat quite like COD although much better.
I pretty much ignored all the other mindless stuff you were writting there; I hope you don’t mind? You’re condiscending, rehashed, “shitbox fan-nerd, damage controle” reply, pretty much bored me to death… But I did however, catch the part about 360 version of battlefield 3 short-comings being “how you say” barely noticable… So you mean to tell me, missing effects, toned down lighting, and rough shadowing is neglectful? Really??? You fan-nerds come to this website and plague the forums with your blind, deluded, expertess on, neglectful, 0.01% graphical differences, every single day; with some of the lamest, dumbest, comments I have ever seen in any website forum… …and you have the gualls, to think that I’m being unreasonable and blind??? Lol… Seriously, don’t make me laugh!!! You, along with Blandroid123, MyAssHurts,Crying1999, and many, many, others, are some of the worst shitbox fan-nerds in the history of fanboysm… You guys don’t even have compelling arguments anymore; now, they’re nothing more than, retarded, rants…
Hmm, what’s really funny about YOUR comment is how you went from a somewhat interesting and compelling argument about PS3 fanboyism and then turned it into a debate with yourself about the mishaps of the PS3 version and how the 360 version has “barely noticeable” problems. I don’t know what version you got, but clearly isn’t the 360 beta or final 360 BF3 game. I’ve watched some 360 footage, with disgust may I point out, and so far I am pretty sure that the the PS3 outperforms on both sp and mp. This may just be my biased opinion, but it is ‘an’ opinion nonetheless.
i agree battlefield looks complete garbage, was over hyped, don’t look much better on ps3 and it had loads more effort put in. games like rage and crysis are much better in my eyes. if ps3 was as good as u ps3 fanboys make out it would be able to hold up against the pc version of battlefield, they already said that both console versions are the equivalent of the pc version on lowest settings, break the ps3 down it has shit memory, a crap graphics card and an over hyped cell processor, don’t get pissed off because microsoft designed a developer friendly console.
oh and xbox has all the best games that run at 60 fps, rage, cod, forza. come next generation and its all over for sony there is no way they will be able to produce a console that is going to touch the next gen xbox for the same price. if windows 8 gets put on new xbox along with all the other features how can sony battle that, they can’t even do private chat let alone party chat due to memory limitations.
xbox rules simple as stop crying and go and buy a mans console you moaning bitches.
Nice to see Moneyshame still crying those bitter tears lol.
As long as you’ve got the beauty of uncharted 3, nothing else matters right? (typically deluded ps3 fanboy logic)
Looks like goldeneye is getting decent reviews as well, it’s another top win for 360 if the performance backs up the superior visuals on 360.
360 version looks better again
slightly more blurry on ps3, nothing to loose sleep over, i played this on wii and enjoyed it, i just hope they can maintain a good framerate on the 4 player splitscreen, it was the most fun my family have had with the wii in ages, but it was a slide show at times, seriously if you enjoy splitscreen games this was fantastic.
this is a def tie only thing i notice about any of the pictures is lighting thats it and that just depends on what u prefer and i prefer the darker settings so i would pick PS3 but all in all its a tie no win for either system but i am happy how they came out like this and i like how most games are ties now
Why isn’t all the multi-platform games looks like that?
Anyway… perfect tie
360 version has sharper textures,Ps3 has less jaggies though its blurred.Last gen graphics anyway.Who needs crappy remakes while we have Uncharted 3,Gears 3,Forza 4,Skyrim,Batman AC etc…
The PS3 version seems a bit blurred when compare to its Xbox 360 counterpart, and I don’t think it’s because it uses lower quality textures, as the blur seems to be applied to pretty much everything on the screen. I’m thinking that either some form of subtle blur was added in attempt smooth out the aliased edges or QAA was implemented (I’m not sure though, it doesn’t seem as aggressive.) Either way, the differences are slight, in my opinion. I wonder how well the game performs on each platform.
@Lens of Truth
Just curious but whatever did happen to the Head2Head for Catherine? Are you guys still in the process of obtaining the copies of both version or did you guys lose interest and scrapped the plan altogether?
If you buy this game over uncharted 3 or LOTR: War of the North. You should check into rehab, just saying
The PS3 version looks a tad blurry. Anyway, this game is worth no more than $20. Anyone who pays more than that for it, needs their head examined.
At first I thought it was a dead set tie. But on the 2nd page it bacame apparent that the PS3 is again, softer. I don’t think that is a bas thing though. The sharper the graphics, the more flaws you notice. Like the old days when you played an Amiga game on a T.V compared to a monitor.
And here we have the worlds biggest ps3 fanboy. You make me really hate charlie sheen. Ps3 wins – “Aw the ps3 has better textures, better AA it’s just the best system ever, so much better than the crapbox3pisstake. I love to shove it up my bum.” 360 wins – “PS3 is again, softer. I don’t think that is a bad thing though. The sharper the graphics, the more flaws you notice.”
No matter what happens, in your world the ps3 always wins even if it just clearly doesn’t.
Man some of the old school 360 fanboy’s better watch out, we have a new true Xbot rising to join the herd with BUYING1999!
You’re not going to take this shit now ANDROID123 are you?!
lmao. Whatever you reckon mate. I pail in comparison to the rest of the rabid PS3 army, and indeed the xbots. I like the Xbox, I still play it sometimes. I just hate microsoft, and Xbots even more. I’ll give it to the bastar*s every change I get. Simple as that. It’s fun.
Normally I side more with the 360 because its my preferred console, but I’m siding with Sanchez77 here. He made a good point and got attacked when there was no call for it. I actually agree. Depending on your setup, the softer look can make for a more realistic experience, just not every time.
360 definitely looks sharper by all accounts with superior AA to boot.
PS3 seems to have dialled up SSAO on the first scene pic.
There was a rumour at one point the PS3 version was going to be 1080p vs 720p for 360. Judging by these pics it looks like that didn’t happen.
And please can PS3 fanboys stop quoting Rob Dyer. He is the and I quote- ‘Sony Computer Entertainment America’s SVP of publisher relations’
At least quote someone who isn’t employed by Sony or at the very least someone from the technical side of things, not some contracted PR twat.
There you go. Does my quote work?
A little out of context- Risen 2 brand manager Daniel Oberlerchner said:
“Some studios say they are going to have the same quality across all platforms, which is to say you take the weakest platform – the Xbox 360 – and you have the same crappy textures for the Playstation 3 and the PC. We want to make sure everything is maxed out on every platform – for example on the PlayStation 3, it is a bit better in terms of Aliasing, but then extra memory is going to be better on the Xbox 360 because the PS3 doesn’t have direct memory – so it has to share everything.”
Basically he is the Brand Manager and his English isn’t the greatest. Extra memory is going to be better on the Xbox 360 indeed.
Well jeez if you’re going to nitpick then why did you even ask? >:[
It’s not nitpicking- it’s the truth. Here’s a fair one from Atsushi Inaba of Platinum Games-
“The PS3 is kind of like a sports car that’s very high-performance and specific in its usage, whereas the 360 is more like a car that everybody’s driving. It doesn’t have the same range as a sports car, but it has more versatility. It’s about adapting your game to those two sorts of different frameworks. That’s where we’re focusing. Fundamentally, the gameplay experience itself is the exact same game.”
Yeah it is nitpicking. lol
You could do the same thing with John Carmack’s quote. He points out the good and bad points for both systems. But come on… who cares about anything neutral anymore? lol
tie
!!!…….
Another one bites d dust
jesus christ… those xbox ppl really have sand in there v***na
Get over it… it’s a F tie for a stupid game
Differences are very minimal. Yes Xbox looks slightly sharper but it isn’t anything to brag about. I really don’t care. There’s so many games coming out that are 100 times better than this. This looks like a PSN or Xbox live game anyway…
quincunx on PS3, MSAA on 360. I’m surprised, it looks quite nice for a title that targets 60FPS.
@LOT
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-11-02-sony-patents-biometric-controllers
Who cares???Im playing with Uncharted 3 right now haha!
The 1st shot comparison shows jaggles on the floor tiles of the PS3. Most shots are clearer on the 360 shots. Looks like a XBOX Victory.
1st image, yes PS3 looks blurry, the telephone thing on the wall and the PS3 screenshot is missing what seems to be 2 red shot gun shells on the bench thing near the telephone???
Firstly I thought that the ps3 version will win this head2head because of the 1080p resolution, but it seems that this isn´t the case.
This will be an interesting head2head because it seems by judging the screenshots that the graphics will be a tie.
LOT only capture @ 720p maybe we need some 1080p screenshots.
both look pretty shitty. Wii version wins this H2H with its superior remote-control-throwing-about-handling
hilarious comment. I wonder how Move support will turn out for this. If anything like DS Extraction, than that’s a great thing. I read somewhere, this takes Move implementation cues from DS Extraction. So maybe I might just pick it up when it’s cheaper to walk down memory lane.
It looks like the PS3 is getting the standard QAA treatment as usual. Other than the added blur effect, I can’t see much of a difference between the version. Perhaps there is a difference in performance. In any case, I take sharpness over blurriness any day.
this is possible too. if this game is in fact native 1080p and NOT native 720p upscalable to 1080p than I stand corrected in my previous assertion. It could very well be that LoT only captured 720p version of PS3 vs. 1080p 360 version. or like you theorize, QAA causing a softer image.
The game looks exactly the same, on both consoles, now only the performance will say.
Both of em are $hit show because of lack of Pierce Brosnan. ;0)
I love reading LoT H2H’s, you guys provide the laughs on a grand scale.
See you all on the next H2H, which ever console wins the laughs just never stop.
xbox texture is sharper
voting – xbox
whats more important is the sharpshooter peripheral which is pretty amazing…so i bought the ps3 version of this game and it works very well…close to killzone3 sharpshooter accuracy…
games like batman arkham city are tieing (ps3 tieing with xbox)…i think all these LoT comparisons are starting to fade in importance as the FF13 developer said…more developers are trying to push the ps3 (which has a better CPU that could do more-if pushed and programmed to)…
this game goldeneye i admit xbox won, esp the textures, ie concrete barricades and the stone mountains…but the only good thing about ps3 version is the lighting on 006 alec looks ever so slightly better…and more realistic…still admit xbox won…
sonic was also another good winner…but final fantasy 13 can prove otherwise…not to mention the ps3 exclusives…drake have gun fights on a moving train, while forests/trees are moving which all look beautiful!
From the looks of things the textures are the same but the PS3 has more intrusive, vaseline-like anti-aliasing. It’s probably using Quincunx while the 360 has its usual MSAA – meaning it looks sharper and somewhat more detailed.
I’m inclined to agree this is a strong possibility.
If I’m not mistaken, the PS3 version defaults to upscaled 1080p while the 360 version doesn’t. in this case, the less sharp PS3 picture may be a result of LoT capturing the upscaled PS3 version (everyone knows upscaled 1080 looks fuzzy compared to native 720) and pitting it against the 720p 360. If so, that’s really really reeeeally stupid on LoT’s part. So hopefully, not. Of course, even if they did do this, they’d probably deny it like they denied installing the full 7.8 GB of Batman AC on 360 to run their analysis.