November 7th, 2011
Posted in 
Rollover to see the Difference.
Move the Slider to see the Difference.
Rollover to see the Difference.
Move the Slider to see the Difference.
Mouse over the image to see through our “Lens”.
Rollover to see the Difference.
Move the Slider to see the Difference.
Rollover to see the Difference.
Move the Slider to see the Difference.
Mouse over the image to see through our “Lens”.
Loading ...Related Head2Heads:
- Call of Duty: World at War
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
- Feature: Modern Warfare 2 Color Differences
- Call of Duty: Black Ops
- Call of Duty: Black Ops
Pages: 1 2
Tags: :PS3, :Xbox 360, Activision, Head2Head, Infinity Ward, Modern Warfare 3, Sledgehammer, Verdict Screenshot H2H*To ensure color accuracy from the PlayStation 3, Xbox 360 and Wii U output, the PlayStation 3 has RGB Full Range set to "Full" and Super White "On", and the Xbox 360 has Reference Level set to "Expanded" and HDMI Color Space set to "RGB". Our capture card we have captured segments from the AVS HD 709 . Blu-ray, HD DVD, & MP4 Calibration suite.
As you will see, each system matches each other at the SOURCE LEVEL. No contrast or gamma settings are manipulated before or after capturing our images/videos. We strongly believe that these types of corrections are done on a individuals preference and should not be adjusted by us. Finally, washed out looking images that are due to contrast or gamma differences will not have any influence on our final verdicts. Please Read through our F.A.Q page if you have any questions or concerns.*
this… i don’t even… wth?
well it was no brainer, i didn’t even need to see the images, i only checked them out to see how big the ps3 is going to suck and lose to xbox360.so here it is, another x360 win and ps3 loss
the analysis will only make it a bigger loss for ps3 as all versions of call of duty did.
Screenshots are one thing. Differences areprobably because PS3 like in Black Ops works in ~960×544,
and X360 in ~1040×608
BUT the most important for me is: is PS3 CoD version ~40fps and X360 ~60fps once again?
http://www.eurogamer.net/videos/digitalfoundry-modern-warfare-2-fps-analysis-part-1
http://www.eurogamer.net/videos/cod-black-ops-gameplay-performance-analysis
M$ better come out with the 720 soon because the 360 is lagging so far behind PS3′s technology. The 360 version is way too bright in most of the pics.
Voted PS3 win!
ps3 better more proper lighting+free Multiplayer
xbox better textures.
no brainer for me…ps3.
if you invest in a samsung, panasonic, lg, sony tv, i think the tv upscaler would counteract the lower res display/textures.
ppl underestimate the need for accurate colours…resolution is not the be all and end all.
READ THIS SH*T
http://www.gamefront.com/robert-bowling-yall-the-xbox-360-version-of-modern-warfare-3-will-be-just-as-good-as-the-ps3-version/
u said it ur self, this is only shit not the truth
Man, the PS3 port looks terrible. I mean, really!! I’d even go far as to say that Treyarch did an even better job with Black Ops. It’s just terrible. Really really really terrible that the port looks shittier than shit.
MW3 PS3 is head and shoulders better than BLOPS on PS3. I’ve played both and while both have low res textures (all CoD games do) BLOPS was blurry, washed out and had an inconsistent framerate. So far, MW3 has been almost a steady 60fps and isn’t nearly as washed out and blurry as BLOPS. And trust me, aliasing is not an issue. Instead of 2xMSAA, I think they used an edge detect or post processing AA method on PS3 that doesn’t do anything with subpixels. But again, aliasing is not an issue.
Again, 360/Xenos’s gamma curve boosts the high-end IREs so that whites look brighter and shadow detail is darker to look more punchy. The PS3/RSX’s GPU has a more standardized gamma curve and is, like it or not, more ‘proper’. On my calibrated TV, MW3 (for the most part) doesn’t look washed out. Compared to the 360 it might, but judging the PS3 version alone on my screen, it looks fine.
Just by looking at the screenshots it really looks that way. I have both systems but am undecided on which version I want to buy. After seeing the screen comparisons I am leaning more towards 360. I’ve always bought COD titles for Playstation, but if these comparisons are true it would be foolish to purchase it on ps3 since I have a choice wouldn’t it? How could a game look so different on xbox than ps3? Any thoughts?
Lazy developers are the culprit here.
http://gamingbolt.com/modern-warfare-3-ps3-versions-quality-support-is-nothing-worry-to-about-sledgehammer
I can’t help but wonder why the they said to not “worry” but instead shit hit the fan.
Holy CRAP! The PS3 version looks better O_O
Lot did you just take the link i posted and jacked it again for a thread lol???
edit: looks like you did get your own pics lol. I was gonna want in on advertising, if you keep jacking my links lol
good work btw
Thistime xbox win easy…bf3=ps3 mw3=xbox… xbox 360 betterc lighting,detail,sao ecc ecc
Yeah, it is like that. But HOLY-FREAKIN’-BALLS the PS3-versions is ugly. I had to say that, this is a joke! They’ve had 2 years, they have made the most money in their industry and they come up with this shitty version.. They’ve had 2 years, for crying out loud!
This is just unacceptable, go screw yourself, IW.
- I wouldn’t pick it up anyway, but now I won’t even rent it, it is unacceptable for their PS3-fans.
- – Also, Uncharted 3 Multiplayer is aaaaaawesome!
Normally im all ‘PC is better than all of this…’
But today, Ill point out an even more obvious thing.
PS3 wins this one by a landslide. sharper textures, more effects, ambient lighting… and what does 360 have? Bloom. Bloom. and more bloom.
Sorry M$ fans, but thats a hall light, not a portable sun superglued to the ceiling.
are you blind? the ps3 version is clearly a half-assed port. Aliasing all over the place, the lighting is messed up, washed out contrast, blurred texture, and more than likely the performance is unstable in comparison.
looks like i’m never getting this game. i’ve never found a price worth paying for a half-assed product like this.
The 360 version looks better, but as far as lighting… other than the extra bloom in the 360 version, the lighting differences might be due to the messed up gamma the 360 has. Most 360 games look more punchy than the PS3 version because the 360′s gamma is messed up while the PS3′s gamma is more standard. If you look at 3-way comparisons between PC/PS3/360, it’s usually the PS3 and PC that look similar in terms of gamma and the 360 has exaggerated/’enhanced’ whites and darker shadows which often leads to a lot of black detail being crushed.
Looks like the AA isn’t the same as previous CoD games where they both used 2xMSAA. Clearly the AA is different this time around.
The PS3 version doesn’t look as bad as BLOPS, but it seems clear that either IW (or whoever worked on this title) had more priority on the 360 version, or the engine itself is hitting it’s limits for the PS3. Could be a little of both. Wouldn’t be surprised if the 360 version got higher priority considering it’s being heavily pushed on that console.
all in all it’s close- and personal preference -lighting/colour or slightly higher res…maybe its a slight win for xbox as you said…depends whether you got xbox gold membership at the end of the day….ps3 no charge! and ps3 looks c’mon pretty darn good!
@BUNNY
Are you blind or what?
Can’t you see how crap is the PS3 version of this shitty game? The comparison is so emabrrassing that the PS3 version should be set on fire straight away.
These developers… err… these morons don’t even deserve to be called developers
you gotta be fucking kiddin’ me!
I only got MW on 360, and never again did i bother with them on consoles the image quality is crap anyway, super lo res. I played a fair few afterwards on PC, but still don’t get what all the hype is all about. Hopefully it’ll all just go away when this console generation ends and the consoles can stop dishing out the same old ‘realistic’ (HA!) FPS and go back to what they did best which were unique games and experiences.
Wow, I agree with you 100%.
BLOOM =/= WIN
Already expected that , Infinity Ward doesn’t know how to make a ps3 build properly.
xbox seems to have better anti aliasing , lightning by far.
I wonder if they are actually using the cell lol!
It’s not antialiasing it’s resolution.
Probably PS3 like in Black Ops works in ~960×544 and X360 in ~1040×608
I play all my Call of duty on Xbox. I have the 1st & 3rd on PS3. The 3rd is a duplicate as I own it on Xbox too. I see no reason to switch to PS3 for this series and the shots shown can’t convince me to. I do wish parity could be achieved for all cross-platforms.
looks like us ps3 owners are getting another black ops botch job, looks like pared back shadows, jaggies, and maybe even a resolution drop, honestly after playing uncharted 3 i just cant accept quality lke this, i know its not a full head to head but its not looking good, with all review copies being sent out on 360, ign stating that they have yet to see the ps3 version in action, ill buy skyrim instead [lets hope thats had the ton of attention bethesda said it has]
Another lazy Cod port for the ps3. This is a sorry state of affairs on Activisions/Infinityward/Sledgehammer part. I know they are in the pocket of microshite but they must hold back development on ps3 on purpose unless the devs cant code for shit. Many devs have shown that better results can be made on both platforms with very little diference between the two. The tech4 engine sucks and by what we saw of Rage the tech5 engine is worse.
you know a developer is shitty when the ps3 version of a multiplatform game looks horrible compared to the 360 version but wow…just wow…they didnt even try
Infinity Ward doesn’t deserve my money.I’m gonna spend it on Skyrim and Uncharted 3!
all in all it’s close- and personal preference -lighting/colour or slightly higher res…maybe its a slight win for xbox as you said…depends whether you got xbox gold membership at the end of the day….ps3 no charge! and looks c’mon pretty darn good!
Skyrim looks way better on xbox360 than ps3…difference bigger than codmw3…prob why im sticking with oblivian for now…
its quite sad, that only gears of war can go up there with killzone3, and nothing can come close to unchartered3…and yet some games like this is the other way around…dont look too dismal, battlefield3 is better on ps3…and batman arhkam city in my view is a tie…also the lighting on this game and realistic skin colours are better on ps3 for codmw3…
Maybe there’s a cheatcode to enable correct lighting and aliasing for the PS3 version? This is so sad to see
This is almost as bad as Bayonetta!
@unscarred785
I think it’s even worse, and even worse than Ghostbusters.
Infinity Ward is just horrible.. Well I don’t care to be honest with you anyway about the “porting” of games. I won’t be picking this piece of shit game up anytime soon. I’ll be spending my money on Skyrim and Revelations.
Well, in my opinion this is a loss for everyone. This game is garbage no matter how you look at it. it may sell millions, but until they actually do something new and not rehash the same game year after year, I will not bother with this garbage.
I honestly thought the PS3 looked better in most of the pictures on the first page, but the 360 won in every pic on the second page. But what the hell is wrong with that light on the 360? It looks like all the energy from a nuclear power plant was diverted to that single light bulb!
Anyways, after playing Uncharted 3 for the past week, seeing all of these pictures make my eyes want to grow mouths and then use them to vomit. Sadly, all the sheep will buy this game, cutting the sales of other developers that actually try to make decent products.
And yet again the most critically acclaimed console gaming franchise is better on the superior xbox.
“And yet again the most overrated console game is poorly ported to the PS3.”
I fixed that for you, you’re welcome.
Xbox 360 is by far not the superior console. Infinity Ward is just another one of your typical lazy developers. If optimised correctly the PS3 can produce MUCH better graphics over the 360. Just because the 360 has a better amount of RAM doesn’t mean it’s better. It’s how the company uses the hardware to it’s advantage.
I own a PS3 and I’m proud of it, I could care less about our multiplatforms “looking slightly” worse when you don’t notice it in the middle of gameplay and they obviously look equal from the eye you can’t spot it out. I’m not going to pay for a console that breaks down 50% of the time and costs 10$ to play a month when I’ll barely use it. Look at EA they put out Dead Space equally on both consoles, Dantes Inferno, and Battlefield 3 was superior on the PS3. Also Valve and Rockstar prefer to develop for the PS3 over Xbox 360. PS3 has so much potential but shame little people use it, I mean it’s 2011 and ALMOST nobody can get multiplatforms looking equal. People take notes from Valve and EA and learn something.
There’s only a 20mb difference in useable ram so it shouldn’t do anything to hinder the games nowadays
Not to mention the ps3′s ram is faster
that is correct, the difference in ram is completely negligible…but what isn’t (and the main reason many games suffer) is that the PS3′s OS demands more ram to run in the background than the 360′s (if you want further proof look at the next xbox dashboard update, it’s being streamilined again so that it uses even less ram so that games have more to work with.) honestly if sony got around to actually improving OS efficiency it would probably be a complete turn around for most games…
@Achilios Dude, seriously, give up…
Lol, a new Xbot I presume? No matter, just another victim to get shutdown I guess. You are sadly mistaken my friend if you think that COD is the most critically acclaimed franchise right now. Honestly, I would probably have to say that the two biggest franchises right now in terms of hardcore fans are probably UC3 or GeOW3. Sorry to break your little world pal, but in case you haven’t noticed a lot of the people who were defending that “franchise” that you’re still fucking up the ass, are the very people who are turning on it and FINALLY realizing that it’s the same rehashed shit every year. I mean just look at the game dude. Capt. Price still looks the same age!! lol
The graphics havent’t improved, the multi will be the same with a few new OP perks and maybe a good story with the sp but that’s probably it. It’s time you accepted the fact that COD had it’s time and now it is coming to an end. Everything dies man, and the sooner you realize that COD isn’t impervious to that rule the better.
On a side note, the PS3 was released 1 year after the 360 yet it’s only a little over 400k consoles behind it. It has a better overall first and second party line-up and it’s hardware & software have continued to show their muscle when the time was truly taken to make a game great like’s it’s supposed to be. If you truly think that the Xbox is superior in every-way, then more power to you. But if you want to take this from a technical and logical point of view, then you need to asses the obvious and not just be subjective with your unproven conclusion. In terms of overall hardware and design, the PS3 is better. Yes the 360 has it’s share of advantages, but they don’t outweigh the PS3′s. I’m sorry
Not gonna respond if the shit you say is stupid, so come up with something intelligent before you start to type.
-To all the Silly Xbots
The dumbest shit I heard all year. “The PS3 was released 1 year after the 360 yet it’s only a little over 400k consoles behind it.” So before you try to trash people, get your facts straight. Also you talk shit about COD, but you know who Capt. Price is. Stupid is is Stupid does.
all you did was quote him are you serious right now? great come back there kid and tbh this game looks way better on the ps3 idk how you Xbot fans think you won i mean honestly you guess must have crappy ass screens because from what i can see xbox looks to dark to see any damn thing
Lol at the thumbs down and lol at your thumbs up . I see we have some Xbots in the house.
Am I right?!?!?!
*Hands go up*
What does me knowing about Capt. Price have to do with anything? I never said I didn’t play the series dude. I personally loved COD4 and was furiously offended when people talked shit about it, so I guess I can understand how you feel. However, when MW2 came out I noticed that almost every single element that made COD4 so genuine was just rehashed in the game. Not even with the consideration to up the graphics on top of that. Black Ops was MW 2.5 and MW3 is MW 2.75. Next to nothing has changed in the game and if you had the decency to be unbiased with your opinion then you would have realized that you’re being cheated out of your money.
Furthermore, what makes my accurate account of hardware sales of the Xbox and PS3 so invalid and ” the dumbest shit you’ve ever heard all year”. Sorry but to be frank, if that is idiopathic to you, then you must be one stupid sob. Go check the hardware sales bro. If you account for the millions of 360s sold because of the RROD and failure issues, then technically the PS3 is ahead of your system by a comfortable margin. But that is beside my original point, if you just look at the charts then you can see that the 360 is currently holding about a little bit over a 400k hardware sales advantage at the moment. I congratulate you on that, but you need to realize that your console was released 1 year before the PS3 and that weighs heavy on that advantage. Yes, the PS3 had the YLOD, and I’m sure that was the first thing you were gonna cry about in your lackluster comeback. Well, let’s address the YLOD for a second. YLOD added a large amount of re-sales towards the PS3′s hardware sales, about a 1/2 a million if I remember correctly, but not nearly as many as the 360/RROD did. In case you guys didn’t know, the 360 has the highest failure rate of any console made to date with it’s average of over 10.1% failure rate. That means that out of every 10 of you 360 owners here, one of you is secretly hiding that you were hit with a RROD in your time as a 360 owner. I personally was hit with an RROD twice , which means that I added 2 more consoles to the 360′s total. If you guys don’t believe what I’m telling you, then by all means go check for yourselves. Google is just a couple clicks away
Btw, you didn’t exactly prove my statements wrong man. You failed to list any credible evidence that makes my comment invalid and until you do so my reliability stays in tact. G’night!!
Look at the thumbs downs on the people just saying the facts. Listen you x-turds, Whether you like it or not, COD is just DEAD. COD got screwed when Battlefield 3 came out and is already just DEAD! Get this through your stupid heads. Honestly though, I don’t know what to be shocked about… The amount of fail at life sore x-bots buying this game or how disgusting activision is. :/
Oh my god.
Who are the idiots voting for PS3?
I owe both systems and the 360 wins without a doubt.
C’mon PS3 fanboys can you not see the difference?
Well no surprise here since this is call of duty after all. Seeing how the game was slapped with the xbox360 seal of approval on every ad there is not a surprise at all. This is Activision and Infinity Ward were talking about, and all that news IW waved arrowed “The ps3 version and the 360 version of the game will be the same” even then it was hard to believe the crap there saying since there pocket money comes from Microsoft its was impossible for that to happen. Well i wasn’t planing to buy it until the price get lower then 30$ so i can play the campaign of the game. Skyrim anyone?
EDIT: Maybe i’ll look somewhat better if you adjust the in-game brightness, i don’t know… Didn’t LOT actually make a vid about adjusting the brightness in MW2 on making the xbox and ps3 look identical? If my memory serves i saw it on LOT’s youtube, i saw it a few months ago while i was sticking my nose in some of there older videos. Maybe they should do the same for this? Just a think that popped into my head.
… Lol Imagine how the frame-rate looks if the graphix are this bad. Black Ops all over again!!! XD
I hope LoT does a PS2 CoD vs. PS3 MW3…tbh I actually think MW1 and 2 looked leagues better than this (on PS3).
youre right, even lens of truth mw2 own head to head stated there was parity more or less, this is just a disaster, its what happens when you have a release date set in stone, it dosent matter to them how bad the ps3 version is, all that matters is shipping it on time, i have a 360 and ps3 and im not buying this for either.
Platform parity, my ass. And we’re back to 2007, sadly. The developers with the most funds this generation ironically tend to be the laziest bunch of them all.
to be honest, the only one that seems to actually put out the most effort for their fans is NISA. they ‘re weak in finances yet they bring over games with not only Japanese VAs but also add English VAs. it costs money to use the JP VAs yet they still put money into keeping it in. They’re moving forward with the graphics starting with hand-drawn animated sprites + they’re now developing a 3D game. they don’t even make as much as the Atlus and Bamco.
but in the end we all know this is developer’s fault. They could do a better game on ps3 and xbox
to me, infinity ward simply make this game for PS3 just to earn more sells, cause they knew PS3 only users will still buy it after all even it does not look as good as other platform, that’s why they don’t really bother to spent more job for the quality of PS3 ver… =_=
tbh, i really doubt it would matter if the ps3 owners never bought a single copy. they’ll just go, “it’s now exclusively 360, blah blah blah! greatest game ever! Blah blah blah.”
Another cod another halfass crappy ps3 port. lazy asses
Yes, Congratulations x$luts! The WORST crappy fps shooter c*ck of duty modern warfail 2.5 is Better on the 360! GREAT JOB LITTLE ONES! Go ahead, Enjoy this kiddy infested noobfest of a game while we Dominate in Battlefield 3. Oh, And speaking of BF3 A.k.a The BEST FPS out there… GUESS which console it’s better on?! Yup, You got it. The Superior PS3!
“Microsoft is deffending an inferior technology” – Rob Dyer
Are you keep saying that bf3 was a ps3 win? LOOOL yeah in your dreams hahaha. Yeah inferior technology:
The valhalla chip which is the xbox 360s newest hardware design combines GPU and CPU. The GPU of the 360 has always been more efficient by a long way than the ps3 GPU even though theoretically slightly less powerful in areas, in real time, its considerably better. However the 360s valhalla chip while merging CPU and GPU onto one chip, the response increased greatly and microsoft had to add a FSB to slow communication down so that it would perform the same as the old consoles. The xbox 360 GPU was actually designed with 64 ALUs but only 48 ALUs are active as it was too expensive too use the extra 16.
Now enjoy this h2h,its a xbox win hahahaaha,now RIP as a truly positive hiv that you are.
Doesn’t matter. What matters is what they cap it at.
Shader operations are pretty much the same between RSX & Xenos. Xenos is twice as powerful in every other category though, ROPS especially.
The theoretical gigaflots for the Xenos CPU is 77 though, while the CELL is up at 230.
Xbox 360 will never be able to do TRE, raytracing, raycasting, or linear matrices in real time while PS3 can.
So much can be offloaded onto the CELL. In Uncharted 2 the CELL handles virtually all graphical operations and they use the GPU as a dedicated physics card using NVIDIA PhysX – albeit the RSX does output the final framebuffer.
At this stage if your game doesn’t look about the same or better on the PS3, lazy dev is well justified – especially with the latest PhyreEngine released by Sony which simplifies CELL chunking, ordering and optimization significantly. Sony’s even willing to send out top CELL software engineers to help devs like they did with Portal 2 which turned out brilliant on PS3.
I’m betting MW3 only uses additional SPEs for physics and geometry at most.
you mean that game where you can only play with 3 of your freinds, hardly a team game when you can’t communicate with most of the team. battlefield was also heavily optimised for ps3 given loads of special attention and it still jst about beat xbox, the game is meant to be played on pc thats a fact it looks shit on consoles next to pc.
if u don’t like cod then why get so angry, oh wait its cuz u do like it and you won’t buy a 360 cuz ur to proud. and as for your quote from rob dyer who ever that is, go and take some quotes from someone alot more in the knowing like say john carmack.
and you would not dominate on battlefield at all, xbox sold a shit load more copies and is made up of more hardcore fps fans why u think ps3 would dominate xbox players is quite funny. also battlefield must have a fair share of kiddys as u put it in the game as you come across as 1.
So truth smooth,this battlefieldfan is crying about the tie that was bf3,for me was a xbox win lol,the fps were better and less tearing,only campain has the blur effect lol,and the controller of xbox is better for shooters,so enjoy this extermination battlefieldfan hahhahahaha now RIP.
Hm, I think you have your facts mistaken my friend. BF3 wasn’t a tie, it was a PS3 win and if you still haven’t accepted that then that’s really sad and weird.
I’m glad you said “for me” because most of the stuff you listed as being a Xbox advantage was so small in the analysis, which is probably why they chose not to mention it lol. Both versions had a rather large amount of tearing, don’t just ignore the fact that your version had tearing to.
Again with the controller thing dude. Nobody in the PS3 community gives 2 shits about what you think of the 360 controller and it being better for fps shooters. Of course if you’re a fucking Xbox owner then you’re going to play with it’s controller, as if you had a choice. You thinking that is just an opinion, just like everyone else. Just because you ‘say’ that the Xbox has a better controller doesn’t make it automatically fact lol. Who died and said you could think otherwise?
You Xbots are truly amazing, you claim and try so hard to prove your superiority over us by stating that everything about the Xbox is better yet you guys fail to realize it’s many mistakes and spout nothing but biased bullshit. *TsK TsK TsK* Silly Xbots
@superdumb@ss, ROFLROFLROFL!!!!!!!!!! THANKS FOR PROVING MY POINT THAT YOU’RE AN !DIOT HAHA!! Only a brain rotten failbot like you would say that Battlefield 3 was an xbox win. Seriously dude, PS3 won that game BIG TIME. Like it’s not even the small little differences.. BIG Differences. And I see you’re dying on the inside that PS3 won so you come here and say it to yourself over and over trying to convince yourself that it was an xbox win. Ewww, You f#cking ugly x$lut tranny hoe. Just shut up, Your comments are lame and pathetic JUST like your dumb self. And yes, c*ck of duty if better on failbox. Which I don’t care because:
Worst fps (cod) better on the worst console (failbox) = Perfect
Best Fps (Battlefield 3) Better on the BEST Console (PS3) = Perfect. See how it goes you imbecile? And RIP? LMFAO! We already pwned your sad @ss and made you (And all the failbots) eat dirt on the BF3 H2H. So don’t come here and start me on that. PWNED BIATCH!
Battlefield 3 had a higher FPS average on PS3, you pulled that straight out of your ass. It was so slight though that it makes no difference at all. Screen tearing again it’s been said that it’s less noticeable on the PS3 because it tends to stay in the overscan of the screen so, just the fact that the PS3 tore 2% more it doesn’t really give the 360 the edge. No one cares what system you’d buy the game for and again with the stupid completely preference based controller argument. It’s just a stupid thing to say.
Lol, since when do sales numbers have anything to do with the amount of hardcore fps gamers you have on a game? I understand you’re still raging over the fact that BF3 was a loss for you console of choice(presumably the 360) but get over it dude. Honestly Batman was a closer h2h then BF3 if you want to just through closeness out there. I’ve have played the 360 version at my cousin’s house and did enjoy. But the REASON i enjoyed is because I saw a lot less skill and tactical teamwork in those 3-6 sessions than I have in the PS3 bf3 community SO FAR. Now, it could have just been an influx of noobs that night or what, but I know my k/d while playing there was like 2.7, which is a jump from 1.9. So yea, just saying.
Btw, if your gonna insult somebody, at least sound credible while you’re doing it dude. Saying, “…xbox sold a shit load more copies and is made up of more hardcore fps fans…” How exactly do you know that, because from the sounds of your first paragraph, it doesn’t even sound as if you like the game much less own it.
You’re quite mistaken if you think that sad excuse of an argument was gonna move anybody into believing anything you said. Come back when you can make a sound argument.
i was actually saying that i don’t no why he thought the ps3 players would dominate the xbox players on battlefield, if u think that ps3 owners would dominate xbox players then prove it. don’t go on like battlefield requires skill and teamwork when u can only play with 3 of you mates and not communicate with the rest of the team.
xbox does have more fps fans out there and more tournament players, there is proof to support this if you actually no anything about the scene.
and as for me insulting some 1 how can you say that when he is the 1 swearing at ppl and making childish statements. her is what he said just so you can go over it again and think about how he actually come across do read it properly this time
“Yes, Congratulations x$luts! The WORST crappy fps shooter c*ck of duty modern warfail 2.5 is Better on the 360! GREAT JOB LITTLE ONES! Go ahead, Enjoy this kiddy infested noobfest of a game while we Dominate in Battlefield 3. Oh, And speaking of BF3 A.k.a The BEST FPS out there… GUESS which console it’s better on?! Yup, You got it. The Superior PS3!”
“Microsoft is deffending an inferior technology” – Rob Dyer
so next time you open your mouth come with something more credible and don’t make yourself look like a complete biased ps3 hero. and i don’t rage over a head2head unlike you, just suck it up and accept that ps3 has lost this 1.
@Smooth, Your stupidity is proven right there. Show me where I said that PS3 won this one you turd. That’s right, I said XBOX WON DIMWIT! But it’s okay, Cause the worst fps ever is better on the worst console ever. In this care, COD on Xbox. Goodbye now sucker
@Smooth, WOW!!! Just take a look at your comment and see if you can realize how much of an !diot you are. Umm, Sorry.. But like it or not, Battlefield 3 is THE BEST Fps EVER and it’s Better on the BEST CONSOLE ever (PS3). Get over it fanboy in denial
Ok, you know what…? All jokes aside… …This is about, the sorriest, shittiest, ugliest, port I’ve seen in years; Activision/Infinity Ward didn’t even fucking try… Seriously, we have games like, Crysis 2, Crysis 1, Rage, Battlefield 3, ect, ect, with little-to-no graphical differences; These games are hundreds to thousands of miles ahead of anything the Call of Duty engine can dish out “graphically”, and yet, somehow, you mean to tell me, Infinity Ward couldn’t get that shit-engine to properly port to PS3??? After 5 Call of Duty games developed on PS3 (3 by Infinty Ward, 2 by Treyarch), these knuckle-heads still can’t make a decent port?… I don’t give a shit what any fanboy say; somebody at Activision is purposely, damaging the PS3 community with these Call of Duty games…
@MoneySha, Agreed, And that little f#cker needs to be beaten to $hit. This shows just how dumb, ignorant and moronic the ppl at Activision are. Oh, But let’s not forget this.. Who’s the one feeding them? That’s right, Micro$hit. Because that’s the ONLY way they can get the game to be made better on their lamebox. Let’s see who would win if microcr@p DIDN’T pay them. Hmm, PS3 of course.
geeezus christ almighty,
people are so ridiculously over the top on here , its sad.
Its a bit worse on ps3, no huge differences, probably slightly lower res textures at points, or possibly slightly lower res overall. Will it make big difference? No!!! You cant even tell the difference in res when you sat back from your tv.Only time you wil really notice , is if you have a 40+ inch tv and sitting 3ft away from it. If you sitting that close, I suggest you sit back, otherwise you gonna go blind, especially with all the porn you watching too lol.
I bought on 360 just, as it was cheaper in deal being offered in store, my brother getting on ps3. He doesnt give a crap about those tiny differences, so refuses to buy 360 too. At worst picture will look slightly softer on ps3 from normal viewing distances.
ps, why does the guy on last image on pg1 look so retarded on 360 screenshot lol. almost a ps3 win just for that shot
This is such a disappointment… Seriously this was their third chance to at least make a good port and they blew it. Funny how M$ needs to pay a butt load of money just to make this a 360 focused game. Anyway, why does the 360 always have overdone lighting in CoD games? I would seriously get annoyed while playing while having the light of 1000 suns shining towards my line of vision. Lighting is good but not TOO MUCH of it.
What made you ever think activision cared abbot making games? Lol they care a
bout money only. The developer may care, but if they’ve no time, threes not much they cash do .ironically mate , it its usually a ps3 game that requires mooney spent on it to look good , as takes longer to program. Activision get money off ms as game sells systems and lots of dlc, along with live subscriptions.(recent chart shkwed various cod’s all ahead of newer games in terms of most played online, with black ops top )
Unbelievable Activision !!!! are u sh*ting on PS3 ??! this obvious !! this is not professional !!! this is not fair for Playstation player !!! how dirty this M$ and activision playing !!! Poeple this game has been port to PS3 and then dumb down graphically … its obvious by purpose this game missing some vibrant colors and lighting affect on PS3 !!! This is not competition ! this is just being childish to ditch one console while there are more or less player on the same console …. I WILL NEVER EVER SUPPORT THIS BAS*ARD and i will strongly suggest the same thing to ALL PS3 players … RENT THIS GAME DON NOT BUY and SUPPORT this unprofessional dev.
what a little cry baby, you ps3 owners don’t seem to moan when ea give battlefield loads of special attention, when that happens you claim the developer knows how to develop properly, battlefield screen tears runs at a shitty frame rate etc.
the ps3 cannot match the xbox most of the time it has inferior memory and graphics card. i don’t no why you get so upset when its your fault for backing the weaker console, swallow your pride and buy a man’s console.
i expect to get a billion thumb downs but i don’t care its quite obvious that ps3 fanboys out number the xbox users on here by about 10-1.
I CAN JUST PICTURE YOU ALL ROLLING YOUR STRESS BALLS ROUND IN YOUR HAND GRINDING YOUR TEETH LIKE YOUR GONNA DO SUMMET LOL.
I can just picture you with no friends watching porn tbh.
You can argue cases in favour of each console , and theres nothing on 360 that comes.close to.uc3.for stunning graphics.
No doubt the 360′s more.flexible architecture is an advantage in most cases, but most cases the engine used is not built around ps3 hardware either . Each has pros and cons, its as simple as that. each.has own strengths. Ultimately, engines are deciding factor in most cases.
Ps3 version of bf3 didn’t get special treatment either.btw, they simply used spu’s as they were intended, utilising its strengths, as they did for 360 too.
no actually i have a missus, and i don’t live with mummy. you mention porn it must be on your mind so go and rub your little pecker to some german midget porn should be right up your street.
and plz stop with uncharted already, the ai is crap, its linear full of videos so don’t go on like its doin summet more than other games out there, i agree it looks stunning but i see games like rage as much more of a technical achievement plus it runs at 60fps.
@SMOOTH
It’s not about the head-to-head lose; it’s about Activision/Infinity Ward not being able to properly port 1 single Call of Duty game to PS3… We’re literally talking about a 6 year old engine, that has been used on 6 Call of Duty games this gen (5 for PS3); When we have games like Crysis 2, Crysis 1, Battlefield 3, Rage, ect, ect, looking clean on PS3 (not to mention, these game’s engines are miles ahead of the Call of Duty engine), it kind of makes you wonder, how in God’s-fuck, couldn’t Infinty Ward get this old-ass, shit engine to properly run on PS3… Seriously, dude; this shit has to be on purpose…
They’ve clearly pushed the ps3 to its limits here to try to keep up with the 360 version, but it looks to be a step too far
Looks decent on 360 though once you turn the brightness up a bit, looks like the 360 will win this h2h.
It’s no biggie for ps3 only owners, losing what will possibly be the highest selling game of the year is no disaster lol.
Geez u scraping new lows there android lol
“highest selling game of the year”. You cant even bring yourself to call it the best game, or anything like that lol
Justin bieber probably highest selling artist this year, wouldnt want him on my radio lol
You are a total shit stirrer, but i forgive you.
Anyway. cant see what fuss is about tbh, usual slight differences, same old cod on inside. it looks like shit on both systems regardless.
LOt relax your bloomin moderation a bit, i get pulled up for using S-H_I_T and even S * * T
Geez u scraping new lows there android lol
“highest selling game of the year”. You cant even bring yourself to call it the best game, or anything like that lol
Justin bieber probably highest selling artist this year, wouldnt want him on my radio lol
You are a total s**t stirrer, but i forgive you.
Anyway. cant see what fuss is about tbh, usual slight differences, same old cod on inside. it looks like s**t on both systems regardless.
lmao at the bieber reference. Excellent point mate.
I hope you realize this is a case of a bad port, and not a hardware-pushing engine.
I’m sure 360 will win the head2head though.
You act like most of people who only own a PS3 play FPS predominantly.
From what I see:
The Xbox 360 version has:
- Superior and much more realistic lighting
- More realistic crepuscular rays
- Superior AA
- Superior AF
- More detailed textures
- Quicker textures streaming
The PS3 version has:
- All-you-can-see jaggies with fugly artifacts around the edges
- Bloom effect missing on certain objects
Frilliant! I absolute can not wait to see the performance analysis. The UNPREDICTABILITY is killing me.
P.S.
At least with the gamma level corrected, both the PS3 and Xbox 360 version of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 would at least look identical at first glance. But this is just…impossible, it’s a new low. And just how many cuckoos are going to support this wretch? Simply disgusting!
you really think it looks that bad bloodios? i personally dont see big fuss tbh. 360 is winner no doubt, worth all the ridiculous fanboy screaming and crying? not a chance.
Id happily play this on ps3 and not care.
do think however, that Activision could have made the effort to go for parity, but was never going to happen tbh
I’m not so much angry about the differences, (as you’re right, it’s still within the tolerable range), but more about the fact that instead of putting a step closer to create a platform parity experience, Infinity Ward seems to have just made a couple steps backward in their lastest project instead. With Modern Warfare 2, Infinity Ward showed considerable improvement in their efforts to achieve platform parity when compares to the original Modern Warfare. It gave hope that the team might be able to improve themselves over time, and perhaps within the next few installments they will be able reach a place where fans across platforms would be glad that they decided to support this team. Obviously, not much of that expectation has been fulfilled here. It’s clearly a step backward from their previous project, and that arouses concerns:
- Why did they not put as much effort in handling the PS3 port this time around?
- Will they not care as long that they know the game will sell like crazy?
- Is this the way it is going to be from now on?
- If we don’t voice our concerns now, how far they will keep sliding down this slippery slope?
In any case, it’s true that I didn’t need to blow myself up like that. It was moment of foolishness, bundled with blind rage.
“- Why did they not put as much effort in handling the PS3 port this time around? – Will they not care as long that they know the game will sell like crazy? – Is this the way it is going to be from now on? – If we don’t voice our concerns now, how far they will keep sliding down this slippery slope?”
Think unfortunately, we both already knew/know the answers to your questions.
Its sad state of affairs, and like you I find it particularly objectionable that its acti vision who are responsible for a poor port, when they, more than any other, have money to put effort into.trying to achieve parity. Time however, is against them. Churning out game after game, especially when you sack staff and tonnes more walk.out , meaning your project is.heavily delayed , and you have to put together new team. Ultimately, activision value profit over everything, and thats sad, when you got smalker devs making effort, as those are ones you can.excuse
“Superior AF”
It seems to me that both have the same AF = None!
“Quicker textures streaming”
How can you tell that from a static image?
Well said
For god sake the engine is based on id tech 3. If you keep adding patties to a burger, there will be a point where you can no longer fit the thing in your mouth with out making a mess of things. In stead of running a bloated piece of whale carcass may be they could ACTUALLY CODE SOMETHING FOR ONCE. Not to mention the retarted amount of bloom and gamma. I bet that they are mostly using the ppe for this one, the least they could do is add background music support
Lazy ass b*tches
Superior AF:
In the middle to lower left of the eighth screenshot on the second page, the ground textures of the PS3 version quickly gets blurred out horizontally as the distance from the view point increases, while in the same distance, the texture details stay consistent in Xbox 360 version. This leads me to believe that the Xbox 360 version has a superior implementation of anisotropic filtering.
Quicker textures streaming:
In the first screenshot on the second page, to the the right side of the firearm, there’s a blurry, indistinguishable object in the PS3 version, while in the Xbox 360 version it’s easy to tell that it’s a boot, with shoelace and other details clearly supporting this assumption. The mass in the PS3 is simply too ugly to be passed off as low-res textures, so the assumption is that the textures must have yet been able to stream in. So, since it was more or less at the same time but only the Xbox 360 version has its boot’s details loaded in, I came to the conclusion that it has quicker textures streaming.
TOO MUCH bloom on the 360, I like the more natural feel of the PS3, except for the washed out colours. Blacks are nothing some in game adjustments can’t fix. Character AA seems better on the PS3, but environment AA seems better on the 360…. Ah well, just get it on the platform of your choice and you’ll be happy. Amiga 2000 for me!!
actually agree with this . i think i prefer lighting in most screenshots on ps3, but doesnt mean technically its better. Sometimes though, the lighting on ps3 isnt really done justice by gamma settings.
This will no doubt a 360 buy for me, but it is so disgusting to see a developer/publisher play “favoritism” on a particular platform just because they are being spoon fed with cash by M$. I like COD but i hate activision with a passion. They are the laziest and cash strapped publisher i have ever seen in the history of gaming. lazy ports, NO DEDICATED SERVER, and outdated engine. Cmon, they are making millions and millions of dollar over this game and we get half assed ports like this??? its just unacceptable. and WHY the F*CK i can’t verify my email for COD:Elite this is bu*lshit. F*CK YOU activision F*CK YOU.
Clear win for 360.
Nothing more to say.
QUESTION: HOW WILL COD:MW3 LOOK LIKE ON PS3?
ROBERT BOWLING: WE HAVE LEARNED FROM OUR PAST MISTAKES AND MADE SURE THAT MW3 VISUALS WILL BE EQUAL ON ALL PLATFORMS.
I AM SO DISGUSTED WITH THIS SH*T!!
i think that this is the end of the road. Call of Duty is for x360 and battlefield for ps3 now they are gonna start the h2h agains each other.
the bayonetta syndrome is an new born event in this gen!!
Wow… they seem to get graphically worse after every iteration now.
I had hope, but it’s pretty obvious that all of Activision’s studios are pretty worthless now. They have like, what? Three developers working on this game and this is the result?
Better leave the more graphically demanding games with great technical ambition to the PS3. Back to Battlefield. :>
Quite obvious here, The WORST Fps (COD) better on the WORST console ($hitbox) And the BEST Fps (BF3) Better on the BEST console (PS3). HEY! It all makes sense now doesn’t it?!
Either way this game looks like shit and its even uglier than most of the games from past couple of years.Graphic wise this game looks like more shit and goes with the shitty console that welcomes it.you want some serious graphics go with BATTLEFIELD 3 and enjoy it on PS3 as its superior.
I’ll wait for the final review to pass judgment and select which version to buy. I need to see this in motion as well as know the screen tearing/performance differences.
But what a difference so far!
I personally like the look of the PS3 version better. 360 seems to have upped the contrast too much. Things get lost in the blacks and bleached out in the whites. PS3 also provides a softer and more pleasant image.
Tough call, they look so different.
PS3 looks more realistic while 360 version looks more cartoony.
It’s like the difference between a Sony TV (PS3) and a Samsung TV (360). Exaggerated colors and forced contrast doesn’t equal better looking. 360 games are often plagued with this “video gamey” look. Yeah I know they are video games but you know what I mean!
Just like Black Ops.
another lose for PS3.
So this is what Activision/Infinity Ward think of PS3 gamers ? Very well then, they can keep their crap game, and I can keep my money until they decide it would be a good idea to finish the work they started and deliver the product they are advertising.
Another COD that is better on the Xbox, what a shock… let’s just hope its not bad as Black Ops
I dont trust Lens of truth anymore on earlier screenshots before the analysis! They always favor the 360 over the PS3.ALWAYS!!! I admit there’s a lot of crappy ports on PS3 but this one is too big to be crappy as this! MW and MW2 was almost identical to 360 and i believe this one will be like them.It will be like BF3 and Crysis 2! It’s just a way to slow down the sales on PS3.You will see the final analysis in like 4 days and that’s enough for wasting 500 000 – 1 000 000 sales on the PS3! I smell naïve sheeps here
the game does look to be a lower res on ps3 but like com’on man. cant infinity ward do games better than this on ps3. sheesh look at battlefield 3 looks almost identical on both platforms just ps3 has extra bloom(ppl thought the bloom on ps3 was over done but damn the bloom on mw3 on xbox is much worse), and effects. but other than that LOT turn the darn rgb setting to full not limited thats why it looks so darn washed out. but other than that xbox does win but what can u expect from a activision title. they turned on sony when the this gen consoles came out cus it was too hard for them to develop games on it. I dont see Naughty Dog complaining
in all honestly the ps3 version isn’t that bad, just lower the gamma in the in-game menu and it will look somewhat like the xbox version, i however am very angry about the fact that the ps3 has (from this screenshots) no AA, in previews cod games both versions had 2xAA so this IS a downgrade, however if AA was cut off to make room for other aspects of the game, the performance better be flawless or else it will be like black ops which was even more sup-hd, half the frames at most times (30 FPS) and the lack of features compared to xbox(like dual id sign-in and multiplayer by default which was later added by a patch but it steel took time to load, heck in zombies at first it didn’t say ones gamertag it said “player 1″) so i will wait for the performance analysis…..
if i write this is a ps3 win i will have a five star rating from like 10 votes. if i write its an xbox win ill have 10 votes with a 1 star rating.
Goes to show that ps3 fanboys are the worst really and there are more of them. why say something is better when its not, its kind of silly really and how it can get ppl so mad is just funny.
ps3 wins a head2head it means the developer really knows what they are doing, neither xbox or ps3 is that powerful they both have there advantages and disadvantages, but they are pretty even. cod at least runs at 60fps and that is needed for fps to feel good, i prefer 60fps all day long.
counter strike is the perfect example of a game not looking the best but id play that over any of the fps shooters we have now, the new counter strike is due out early next year and requires skill, tactics and teamwork, if u want a hardcore addictive military shooter then watch out for that game as nothing else touches it in my eyes.
Actually it goes to show you have no life and you care too much about what other people think about your comment and rate you.
The 3rd pic down of the flags just screams POWERED BY CELL!
All thats missing is the giant enemy crab. I thought the dev at SledgeHammer said the PS3 was the superior system, why didnt his awesome B team developers make the game at least like for like on both systems!?!
Its times like these im glad im a playslut and xbot all in one! Bring on the SKYRIM H2H, thats what we are all really here for, the GOTY!
Is this a joke?
I seriously started laughing after the first pic and then literally popped a nerve from not being able to stop laughing with the 3rd pic.
This is good stuff. Still can’t stop laughing
The only thing funny in a very very VERY disturbing way is how much amusement and joy you’re getting from looking at comparison screenshots of a videogame. What defines a productive and fulfilling day in your book? Counting the hairs on your armpit in the mirror?
Hold on I’ll be with you in a sec. Still trying to get a hold of myself from laughing so hard. Hold on a sec…..
|
|
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaahahhahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!
|
|
Ahahahah…oh dear please ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!
|
|
|
Oh lord stop….AHAHAhAHHAhA!!! WOO!! Okay….
I’m back
Now then what were you saying? Oh that’s right so why so serious? This is Lens of Truth a pic comparison site. We are all here to judge comparison pics.
I saw the pics and my immediate reaction was to laugh. I mean this was a true GENUINE laugh where all thoughts were suspended and held hostage by this inner need to bust out laughing.
Why are you criticizing me for laughing? Laughter is good for one’s overall well-being.
If you’re wondering why I’m laughing so hard please take a look at the 3rd pic with the flags
Anyway,just check the page 2 screenshots,it’s the ps3 who have better AA and better lighning effects on some pics.The look of the blur is due to like always Lens of truth set it to limited instead of full RGB.
Normally i’m all for defending the PlayStation 3 when the differences are minor, but anyone seeing these images and claiming the PlayStation 3 looks better, are too busy smoking penis to admit the truth.
360 version looks miles better.
Most of the time i’m also all for advocating the PC version as the best for multiplatform games, but as it stands the PC version is only slightly better than the 360 version (perhaps even worse if you don’t know how to fiddle with config files).
See this image : http://i.imgur.com/2EE3t.jpg
Dual GTX590 with everything maxed out only looks somewhere half-decent with config file edits, and even then it still looks relatively sub-par, this is what happens when developers don’t take the time to update the engine, you end up with a game that looks exactly like something you’d expect to see in 2006.
All in all, the entire game is appauling on all three systems, poor graphics, poor gameplay, buggy multiplayer.